remove to accommodate

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "remove to accommodate" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the need to eliminate something in order to make space or allow for something else. Example: "We need to remove the old furniture to accommodate the new seating arrangement."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Some major branches have already been removed to accommodate an existing roadway.

The New York Times

Mr. Foley even had radiators revamped or removed to accommodate one of his passions — art.

The New York Times

Our room was so tiny that the furniture had to be removed to accommodate our luggage, one big suitcase each.

The New York Times

By week's end, Mr. Lebanov would depart for Kostroma, carried prone in his brother's little Lada, a passenger seat removed to accommodate his cast.

The New York Times

Johan van Slooten provides some detail: "They had been removed to accommodate the closing ceremony which took place before the final".

The Guardian - Sport

In redesigning the spacecraft to forestall another such accident, one couch was removed to accommodate an independent life-support system for individual pressure suits.

Britannica

The left front seat has been removed to accommodate a stretcher and most of the available interior space is filled with instruments and medical supplies.

The New York Times - Science

Earth is represented in the use of timbers reclaimed from the building's roof, which was removed to accommodate the second level Mr. Kushner built.

The New York Times

(After Jan . 8 the screens were removed to accommodate all 7,000 stone replicas, which are suspended in the pattern in which they landed).

The New York Times - Arts

All across the country, from Maine to the Grand Canyon to California, the flow of water from dams is being readjusted and in some cases dams are being removed to accommodate aquatic ecosystems once again.

The New York Times

Once associated with films of fish in natural-history museums, IMAX now offers its products to multiplexes (the first few rows of seats are sometimes removed to accommodate the bigger screens).

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "remove to accommodate", clearly state both the item being removed and what it is being removed for to ensure clarity. For example, "Remove the old hard drive to accommodate the new SSD."

Common error

Avoid using "remove to accommodate" without specifying what is being accommodated. This can leave the reader wondering why the removal is necessary. Always provide context to justify the removal.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "remove to accommodate" functions as an infinitive phrase expressing purpose. It indicates the reason or intention behind an action, specifically, the removal of something. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "remove to accommodate" serves as a purpose connector, explaining why something is being removed – to make way for something else. Ludwig AI analysis confirms that this phrase is grammatically correct but the absence of examples makes it challenging to assess the real-world usage contexts. While there is a lack of example sentences, it is clear that the phrase is to express that some actions are to be undertaken to get space for something else. Therefore, to maximize clarity, it's best to specify what is being removed and what is being accommodated. While it's not particularly formal, it's suitable for a range of writing contexts. Related phrases include "eliminate to allow for" and "discard to make way for", which offer similar meanings with slight variations in tone. Overall, while grammatically sound, ensure to provide adequate context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

withdraw to accommodate

Highlights the act of taking something out of the way to accommodate.

eliminate to allow for

Focuses on the action of eliminating something to create an opportunity.

discard to make way for

Emphasizes getting rid of something to clear a path for something new.

clear out to make room for

Highlights the process of clearing space to accommodate something.

take away to provide for

Focuses on subtracting something to ensure provision for something else.

dismantle to incorporate

Suggests a more complex removal process to integrate something new.

extract to house

Focuses on the removal aspect to find space to house something.

cut back to make provision for

Highlights the process of cutting back to provide resources or space.

detach to integrate

Suggests separating to integrate something else.

vacate to enable

Emphasizes the action of vacating a space to enable something else.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "remove to accommodate" for better clarity?

Consider alternatives like "eliminate to allow for", "discard to make way for", or "clear out to make room for" depending on the specific context.

What's a formal way to say "remove to accommodate"?

In formal contexts, you might use "eliminate to facilitate" or "withdraw to accommodate". These options sound more professional and precise.

Is "remove to accommodate" always the best choice, or are there times to avoid it?

While grammatically sound, "remove to accommodate" can sometimes sound awkward. If a simpler phrasing like "remove for" works, it might be preferable. For example, "Remove the obstacle for better access" is clearer.

How does "remove to accommodate" compare to "replace with"?

"Remove to accommodate" focuses on the act of creating space, while "replace with" emphasizes the substitution. For instance, "Remove the old engine to accommodate the new one" highlights the space needed, whereas "Replace the old engine with the new one" focuses on the substitution itself.