omission of which

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "omission of which" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in formal writing to refer to something that has been left out or excluded from a statement or list. Example: "The report included several key findings, the omission of which could lead to misunderstandings."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

That draft had mentioned Afghanistan, the omission of which from Mr. Romney's speech drew criticism from Democrats and Republicans alike.

The New York Times

It's a depressing omission of which, I admit, I was completely ignorant until I heard this glorious collection of letters, which inspired me to find out more, much more - indeed, everything I possibly could - about his extraordinary life.

The Guardian - Books

Instead, he thinks he can argue forcefully for the four causes as real explanatory factors, that is, as features which must be cited not merely because they make for satisfying explanations, but because they are genuinely operative causal factors, the omission of which renders any putative explanation objectively incomplete and so inadequate.

SEP

An earlier cut I screened in 2009 included more music by the Super Furry Animals, the omission of which kinda blows. .

Vice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

The errors and omissions, of which there were many, were gloatingly detailed.

The Guardian - Film

The sin of omission to which Goldman has confessed, meanwhile, will look far from nefarious to most.Spared embarrassment But many will conclude that Goldman came off better.

The Economist

Most egregious was your omission of grace, which is the very idea that makes Hell sensible.

The Economist

To a reader of the Gospels, the most-striking feature of the creed is probably its omission of that which occupied a major part of the Gospels, the story of Jesus' life and teachings.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The MCC touring team was regarded as a strong one by commentators; the only controversy was the omission of Frank Woolley which was not fully explained.

Wikipedia

Some of these treatment differences were justified, for example, the omission of chemotherapy, which is nonproven as an adjuvant treatment in the elderly (EBCTCG, 1998).

British Journal of Cancer

The PCT result led to an omission of antibiotics, which would otherwise have been given in eight out the 30 tests.

Critical Care

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "omission of which", ensure it clearly refers to a specific item or concept previously mentioned in the sentence or paragraph for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "omission of which" when a simpler phrasing like "which was omitted" or "that was left out" would make the sentence more concise and easier to understand.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "omission of which" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically used to specify or clarify what has been left out or excluded from something. It is often found in formal contexts, as evidenced by the examples provided by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

25%

Encyclopedias

25%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "omission of which" is a grammatically correct phrase used to specify an exclusion, most frequently found in the fields of science, news, and encyclopedias. While correct, it's rather formal and infrequent. As Ludwig AI points out, it is a usable phrase in written English, especially in formal contexts. For simpler and clearer communication, consider alternative phrases such as "exclusion of which" or "absence of which". Always ensure that the item being referred to is clearly identified for maximum clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

exclusion of which

Replaces "omission" with "exclusion", highlighting the act of leaving something out.

absence of which

Substitutes "omission" with "absence", emphasizing the lack of something.

lack of which

Uses "lack" instead of "omission", focusing on the deficiency or shortage.

failure to include which

Rephrases the omission as a "failure to include", making the phrasing more explicit.

neglect of which

Replaces "omission" with "neglect", suggesting a disregard or oversight.

oversight of which

Uses "oversight" instead of "omission", implying an unintentional exclusion.

the part that was left out

Simplifies the phrase to highlight the element that was not included.

what was not included

Focuses on the information or element that has been excluded.

something left unsaid

Highlights something that was implied but not directly expressed.

the missing part

Emphasizes the missing aspect, implying something incomplete.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "omission of which" to sound more direct?

Consider using phrases like "which was omitted", "that was left out", or "which was excluded" for a more straightforward and less formal tone. These alternatives provide clarity without sacrificing precision, enhancing overall readability.

Is it always necessary to use "omission of which" in formal writing?

No, while "omission of which" is suitable for formal contexts, simpler alternatives like "exclusion of which" or "absence of which" can often be more effective in conveying your message clearly. Choose the phrasing that best fits the tone and audience of your writing.

What's the difference between "omission of which" and "something that was omitted"?

"Omission of which" is more concise and often used in formal writing, while "something that was omitted" is more verbose and can be used in less formal settings. The choice depends on the desired tone and level of formality in your text.

How does the context affect the choice between "omission of which" and similar phrases?

In technical or legal writing, "omission of which" can emphasize a deliberate exclusion or oversight. In general writing, simpler alternatives may be preferable for clarity. Consider the impact of the phrasing on the reader and choose accordingly.