of what constituted

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "of what constituted" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe or explain the elements that came together to make up something. For example: "The success of the project was made possible by the combination of what constituted the perfect team."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It illustrated a different conception of what constituted achievement".

The New York Times - Arts

No definition of what constituted a crime was given.

The New York Times - Health

That was certainly Hegel's definition of what constituted a tragedy.

The New York Times - Books

CCTV argued that there was a "common understanding" in the UK of what constituted a family.

The Guardian

I had no good answer beyond indistinct ideas of what constituted human decency.

The New York Times - Sports

Szarkowski's notion of what constituted "significant fact" was both fiercely discerning and radically democratised.

The Guardian - Books

Mr. Obama then danced with them around the question of what constituted success in Iraq.

The New York Times

There was also the question of what constituted Mr. Sharon's demand of "absolute calm".

The New York Times

They wanted to reduce that level, regardless of what constituted justice for any individual involved.

The New Yorker

Turning back to art, he played with the boundaries of what constituted art work at all.

The New Yorker

Their ideas of what constituted attractive self-presentation were a little wayward.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "of what constituted", ensure the context provides a clear reference point in time to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "of what constituted" when referring to current or future compositions. Use "of what constitutes" for present and future contexts.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "of what constituted" functions as a prepositional phrase, often introducing a noun clause that serves as the object of a preposition. It specifies the components or elements that comprised something in the past. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Science

33%

Academia

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "of what constituted" serves to dissect and define the elements forming something in the past. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, with its usage spanning across diverse contexts like News & Media, Science, and Academia. When writing, use this phrase to clearly explain historical compositions, ensuring correct tense usage to maintain accuracy. Remember to consider similar alternatives, such as "of what comprised", for nuanced expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

of what comprised

Replaces "constituted" with "comprised", focusing on the elements that make up something.

of what comprised of

Includes "of" after comprised, altering the structure while maintaining similar meaning.

of what existed

Substitutes "constituted" with "existed", shifting the focus to what was present at a certain time.

of what represented

Changes "constituted" to "represented", emphasizing the symbol or meaning of something.

of what embodied

Replaces "constituted" with "embodied", highlighting the physical expression or representation of something.

of what involved

Changes "constituted" to "involved", emphasizing the components or aspects that are included in something.

of what encompassed

Substitutes "constituted" with "encompassed", focusing on the scope or range of something.

of what incorporated

Replaces "constituted" with "incorporated", focusing on the elements that are included or integrated into something.

of what defined

Changes "constituted" to "defined", emphasizing the elements that specify or characterize something.

of what created

Substitutes "constituted" with "created", focusing on the origins or formation of something.

FAQs

How can I use "of what constituted" in a sentence?

You can use "of what constituted" to describe elements that formed something in the past. For example, "The committee investigated the details of what constituted a breach of contract".

What phrases are similar to "of what constituted"?

Similar phrases include "of what comprised", "of what represented", or "of what involved". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it correct to say "of what constitutes" instead of "of what constituted"?

The correct tense depends on the context. Use "of what constituted" for past events and "of what constitutes" for present or ongoing situations. For example, "They discussed of what constitutes best practice".

What's the difference between "of what constituted" and "of what was"?

"Of what constituted" refers to the elements that formed something, while "of what was" refers to the state or nature of something at a particular time. The phrases are not interchangeable; the former focuses on composition, the latter on existence or condition.