of both organizations

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "of both organizations" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to something that is shared or related to two different organizations. Example: "The collaboration will benefit the goals of both organizations involved in the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Encyclopedias

Formal & Business

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Dr. Hass is president of both organizations.

The New Yorker

He spoke on behalf of both organizations after Enron's collapse.

The New York Times

He was also a founder of both organizations.

The New York Times

He was elected a fellow of both organizations.

The Washington Post

This collaborative initiative capitalizes on the missions of both organizations.

Advances in Building Technology Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Building Technology 4–6 December 2002, Hong Kong, China

The goals of both organizations (were) scrutinized, evaluated, and approved.

Cornell University

The heads of both organizations report to King Abdullah, and he has not intervened.

The New Yorker

But after the headquarters of both organizations were bombed last year, foreign experts pulled out.

The New York Times

Criticism focused especially on the informal, nonlegalistic institutionalism of both organizations.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Rockhurst, located in Kansas City, is a member of both organizations.

The New York Times - Sports

Members of both organizations tend to be transparent about their fees.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "of both organizations", ensure that the two organizations have been clearly identified in the preceding text to avoid ambiguity. For instance, "Following the merger of Acme Corp and Beta Industries, the new policies of both organizations will be implemented next quarter."

Common error

Avoid using "of both organizations" when referring to attributes that are not truly shared or equally applicable. For example, stating "the employees of both organizations are satisfied" may be misleading if satisfaction levels differ significantly.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "of both organizations" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase modifying a noun, adjective, or verb. It specifies that something applies equally or jointly to two distinct organizational entities. Ludwig showcases how the phrase connects shared attributes or actions to these entities.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

41%

Science

22%

Academia

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

12%

Encyclopedias

7%

Wiki

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "of both organizations" is a grammatically correct and commonly used prepositional phrase that clarifies the shared nature of attributes, responsibilities, or impacts concerning two organizations. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and widespread use. As demonstrated by the diverse examples, the phrase is versatile, appearing in news, scientific research, academic papers, and business communications. When employing this phrase, ensure that the organizations are clearly identified to maintain clarity and avoid overgeneralizations. The most frequent authoritative sources include The New York Times and The New Yorker.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

from both entities

Replaces "organizations" with a more general term "entities", suitable for broader contexts beyond formal organizations.

between the two entities

Focuses on the relationship between two entities instead of their shared attributes or goals.

shared by the two groups

Highlights aspects that are commonly held or experienced by both groups.

common to both groups

Stresses the commonality existing between the two groups in question.

pertaining to both institutions

Replaces "organizations" with "institutions" to specify a formal nature, and uses "pertaining to" to indicate relevance.

involving both parties

Emphasizes the participation or implication of both parties in a specific action or situation.

relevant to both agencies

Specifies the context as agencies, suggesting a governmental or administrative setting.

affecting both bodies

Indicates the influence or impact on both entities, using "bodies" as a formal alternative.

binding on both entities

Highlights a constraint or obligation that applies equally to both entities involved.

applicable to both sides

Emphasizes that something is equally relevant or suitable for both parties involved.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "of both organizations" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases such as "from both entities", "pertaining to both institutions", or "relevant to both agencies". These alternatives offer a more elevated and professional feel while conveying the same meaning.

Is it grammatically correct to say "of both organizations"?

Yes, the phrase "of both organizations" is grammatically sound and widely accepted in both formal and informal writing. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability.

What are some common contexts where "of both organizations" is used?

The phrase "of both organizations" is commonly used in contexts involving mergers, partnerships, policy discussions, and shared initiatives across different sectors such as business, academia, and governmental agencies. For example, "the collaboration will benefit the goals "of both organizations" involved in the project".

What's the difference between "of both organizations" and "between the two organizations"?

"Of both organizations" refers to attributes, actions, or impacts directly connected to both entities. "Between the two organizations" focuses on the relationship or interaction occurring specifically between them. For instance, "the agreement "between the two organizations" outlines shared responsibilities" emphasizes the direct interaction and agreement between them.