Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

obviously you would

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "obviously you would" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when you want to express that something is clear or expected in a given context, often implying that the listener should already understand this. Example: "If you were in my position, obviously you would choose the same option I did."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

42 human-written examples

"Obviously, you would remember something like that.

Obviously you would peer into other people's plates.

"Obviously, you would love for them to be at full strength.

And, if a rep is under 18, obviously you would need parental permission".

News & Media

The New York Times

Obviously you would want to avoid getting one with Superfish installed.

Well, obviously you would have heard about it if any had been found ("or would you?" say the conspiracy theorists).

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

18 human-written examples

"Obviously, you'd prefer that it not happen".

News & Media

The New York Times

Obviously you'd like them to be liked.

So obviously, you'd like to have that ratio be greater than 1.

"Obviously, you'd like to set guys up as soon as you could," Girardi said.

So obviously you'd want to maximize what, back then, was a relatively slow film speed.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Ensure that what you consider 'obvious' truly is within the context of your audience to avoid misunderstandings or condescension.

Common error

Avoid using "obviously you would" as a substitute for a clear explanation, particularly when dealing with complex subjects or unfamiliar audiences. Always support claims with evidence, even when something may seem self-evident.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "obviously you would" functions as an adverbial phrase combined with a modal construction, expressing a strong expectation or a logical conclusion. Ludwig shows many examples, confirming its role in asserting what's predictable or self-evident in a given scenario.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Academia

30%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Science

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "obviously you would" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to indicate a strong expectation or logical conclusion. As Ludwig AI confirms, it serves to emphasize the predictability of an action based on shared understanding. While generally neutral in register, it's important to ensure that the 'obvious' premise is indeed clear to your audience and to avoid overuse as a substitute for detailed explanations. Consider using alternatives such as "naturally you'd" or "of course you would" depending on the desired nuance.

FAQs

How can I use "obviously you would" in a sentence?

You can use "obviously you would" to indicate something is expected or logical in a given situation. For example: "If you were in my position, "obviously you would" choose the same option."

What are some alternatives to "obviously you would"?

Alternatives include "naturally you'd", "of course you would", or "surely you would", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is "obviously you would" too informal for professional writing?

While generally acceptable, "obviously you would" can sometimes come across as informal. Consider using a more formal alternative like "it is clear you would" in highly professional contexts.

What's the difference between "obviously you would" and "obviously you should"?

"Obviously you would" implies a prediction based on someone's character or circumstances, while "obviously you should" suggests a moral or practical obligation. For example, "Knowing him, "obviously you would" expect him to be late" versus "To be fair, "obviously you should" be on time".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: