Ai Feedback
Exact(60)
In fact, new erosions were observed in four patients (30.8%) in the repair observed group.
For DCIS cases, similar first-line mastectomy rates were observed (Group 1, 30.3% vs. Group 2, 33.3%, P = NS).
The change in total radiographic score/year (P < 0.05) and change in erosion score/year (P < 0.01) were significantly lower in the repair observed group.
The frequency of T to A and A to T transversions, the second most frequently observed group of mutations, ranged from 12 to 33%%.
The changes in radiographic scores per year (total radiographic score and erosion score) were lower (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively) in the repair observed group.
Permutations of associations, observed group sizes, and corresponding significance tests within and across time partitions were implemented in the OCaml programming language; code is available upon request.
Classification of patients into three respective risk groups revealed good agreement between mean predicted and observed group mortality risks for both Models 1 and 2 (Table 5).
In addition, we observed group differences in the splenium of the CC, indicating that the microstructural white matter abnormalities may also extend to more posterior areas.
We observed group differences, during memory encoding, in medial temporal, frontal, and striatal regions and moreover, these regions were differentially sensitive across groups to dopaminergic perturbation.
The fact that we still observed group differences based on these self-reported data provides some confidence that real differences exist between SO and OW/OB groups.
The largest increase in confidence levels was observed in the interactive group followed by the observed group, (p = 0.005, 0.01) respectively.
Related(20)
preserved group
perceived group
demonstrated group
respected group
attributed group
retrieved group
observed cluster
removed group
revived group
monitored group
enforced group
verified group
moved group
recognized group
discovered group
investigated group
observance group
implementation group
monitor group
respect group
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com