objects to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "objects to" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to express disapproval or opposition to something. Example: "She objects to the proposed changes in the policy."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Italy objects to Germany.

The Economist

"Everyone objects to everything".

The New York Times - Magazine

Nobody objects to that.

The Guardian

My girlfriend objects to this practice.

The New York Times

But Maier objects to the comparison.

The New Yorker

Yisrael Beiteinu objects to sitting alongside Meretz.

The Economist

Neither objects to her plan.

The New York Times - Magazine

James objects to the signs.

The New York Times

More specifically, it objects to Mr. Falk.

The New York Times

And girls were foreign objects to me.

The New York Times

Funny how NOONE objects to an upgrade.

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "objects to", consider the strength of your statement. This phrase can be softened by adding qualifiers such as "mildly objects to" or strengthened by saying "strongly objects to".

Common error

Avoid using "objects to" in very informal settings. While grammatically correct, it may sound overly formal or stilted in casual conversation. Opt for more natural alternatives like "disagrees with" or "is against".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "objects to" functions as a verb phrase expressing disagreement or opposition. As Ludwig AI states, it is a grammatically correct expression commonly used to indicate that someone or something is not in agreement with a particular idea, plan, or action.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

79%

Science

12%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "objects to" is a versatile verb phrase used to express disagreement or opposition. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and wide usage, particularly in news and media, as well as scientific contexts. While applicable in various situations, it leans toward a neutral to formal register. When writing, consider the formality of the context and choose more informal alternatives like "disagrees with" for casual conversation. Remember that "objects to" is effective for formally registering disapproval or resistance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

opposes

A direct synonym, indicating active resistance or disagreement.

raises objections to

Emphasizes the act of voicing disagreement or concerns.

expresses disapproval of

Highlights the feeling of not approving something.

voices opposition to

Stresses the act of publicly disagreeing with something.

disagrees with

A more general term for not being in accord with something.

takes exception to

Suggests a more personal or offended disagreement.

is against

A simpler way to express being in opposition.

is not in favor of

Indicates a lack of support for something.

challenges

Indicates questioning or disputing something.

contests

Suggests actively disputing or fighting against something.

FAQs

How can I use "objects to" in a sentence?

Use "objects to" to show disagreement or opposition. For example, "The committee "objects to" the proposed changes" or "She "objects to" the new policy".

What are some alternatives to "objects to"?

You can use alternatives such as "opposes", "disagrees with", or "is against" depending on the context.

Is it more formal to say "objects to" or "disagrees with"?

"Objects to" is generally more formal than "disagrees with". "Objects to" suggests a more official or serious opposition, while "disagrees with" is more neutral.

What's the difference between "objects to" and "raises objections to"?

"Raises objections to" emphasizes the act of voicing disagreement or concerns, whereas ""objects to"" simply states the opposition. The former implies taking action to express disagreement.