objects of ridicule

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "objects of ridicule" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe people, actions, or things that are made fun of or mocked by others. Example: "The comedian's routine often included various objects of ridicule, poking fun at societal norms and behaviors."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

31 human-written examples

They are objects of ridicule.

The New York Times

They have become objects of ridicule.

The Guardian

But the Jefferson cadets are not always objects of ridicule.

The New York Times

Some became objects of ridicule at school or suspicion at airports.

The New York Times

In telecoms leading firms were reduced to indebted objects of ridicule.

The Economist

Should people with dwarfism – or other disabled people – be objects of ridicule or titillation?

The Guardian - Opinion

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

27 human-written examples

You can not be the object of ridicule".

The New York Times - Magazine

— This city has long been an object of ridicule.

The New York Times

(It's never easy loving an object of ridicule).

The New York Times

When the world fails to change as promised, however, the music becomes an object of ridicule.

The New Yorker

So it sits empty, an object of ridicule around here, often referred to as the "spa".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the impact of labeling someone or something as an "object of ridicule". Ensure that this label is accurate and doesn't perpetuate harmful stereotypes or contribute to further marginalization.

Common error

Avoid using "objects of ridicule" in situations that require sensitivity or gravity. Overusing the term can trivialize serious issues and undermine the intended message.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "objects of ridicule" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. According to Ludwig, it is grammatically correct and commonly used. It identifies entities that are subjected to mockery or derision.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

95%

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

Science

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "objects of ridicule" is a grammatically sound and commonly used noun phrase, as affirmed by Ludwig. It primarily functions to denote entities that are consistently mocked or scorned. Its usage is most prevalent in news and media contexts. When writing, ensure the term's accuracy to prevent perpetuating stereotypes. While acceptable, consider alternative phrases like "laughingstocks" or "targets of mockery" depending on the nuances. Avoid overuse in sensitive contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

laughingstocks

This term directly implies being someone or something that is laughed at, focusing on the result of ridicule.

targets of mockery

Focuses on the act of mocking and how something or someone becomes the target.

butts of jokes

Emphasizes the role of being the subject of jokes, indicating a lighter but still demeaning form of ridicule.

figures of fun

This phrase suggests that someone or something is seen as amusing, but often in a disrespectful way.

subjects of derision

Highlights strong contempt and scorn, implying a more intense form of ridicule.

easy targets

Focuses on the vulnerability of those being ridiculed, implying they are easily made fun of.

people to make fun of

Directly states the act of making fun of someone, clarifying the active role of the ridiculers.

things to laugh at

Emphasizes the act of laughing, positioning the object as something purely for amusement.

people held in contempt

Indicates a deep level of disrespect and disdain, suggesting a more severe form of ridicule than simple teasing.

public embarrassments

Highlights the public nature of the ridicule and the resulting shame or awkwardness.

FAQs

How can I use "objects of ridicule" in a sentence?

You can use "objects of ridicule" to describe entities that are consistently mocked. For example, "The politician's policies became "objects of ridicule" after the scandal broke".

What are some alternatives to "objects of ridicule"?

Alternatives include "laughingstocks", "targets of mockery", or "subjects of derision", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "objects of ridicule" in formal writing?

While grammatically correct, using "objects of ridicule" in formal writing depends on the tone and context. It may be more suitable for analytical or critical pieces rather than celebratory or neutral reports.

What's the difference between "objects of ridicule" and "objects of scorn"?

"Objects of ridicule" implies being laughed at or mocked, while "objects of scorn" suggests being viewed with contempt or disdain. The former is more about mockery, the latter about strong disapproval.