objective findings

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "objective findings" is grammatically correct and commonly used in written English.
It is typically used in a medical or scientific context to refer to verifiable facts or measurements that are free from personal bias or interpretation. Example: "The doctor's report included both subjective symptoms reported by the patient and objective findings from the physical examination."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"M.C.S. has to be based upon objective findings," he said.

The New York Times

It embodies the concepts of relativity, subjective truth and the subconscious -- ideas independently supported by the objective findings of science.

The New York Times - Arts

Improvement in objective findings did not correlate with changes in HQ scores.

Stanford University

If you're asking whether more attention to this will lead to a proliferation of diagnoses, what distinguishes this from other pain syndromes is that there are objective findings.

The New Yorker

"Their objective findings have helped improve transparency, accountability and efficiency as we work with the Iraqi people to establish an independent, stable and prosperous Iraq," she said.

The New York Times

Reevaluations demonstrated a marked improvement in both subjective and objective findings.

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

Visual EEG scoring and self-report measures were usually consistent with objective findings.

International Journal of Psychophysiology

We also correlated subjective and objective findings.

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

This system combines assessments of subjective symptoms and objective findings.

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Further investigation is warranted to determine if these objective findings translate into improved surgeon performance.

Duke University

These scoring systems combine assessments of subjective symptoms and objective findings.

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "objective findings" in scientific writing, clearly specify the methods used to obtain these findings to enhance credibility.

Common error

Avoid presenting "objective findings" without sufficient context or interpretation. Raw data alone may not convey the full significance of the results.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "objective findings" primarily functions as a noun phrase, often serving as the subject or object of a sentence. As Ludwig AI explains, it refers to verifiable facts or measurements free from personal bias, supported by numerous examples from scientific and news sources.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

52%

News & Media

25%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "objective findings" is a grammatically correct and frequently used noun phrase, particularly in scientific, academic, and news contexts. It denotes verifiable facts or measurements, free from personal bias, crucial for credible reporting and research. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage and common occurrence. As highlighted in the writing guidance, while "objective findings" provide a factual basis, it is essential to present them with sufficient context for a complete understanding. Related phrases include "empirical observations" and "verifiable results", offering alternative ways to express similar concepts, while the phrase's high frequency underscores its importance in formal and scientific discourse.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

empirical observations

Focuses on observations that are based on factual evidence.

verifiable results

Highlights the aspect of results that can be checked and proven true.

factual discoveries

Emphasizes the aspect of uncovering facts.

evidence-based data

Stresses that the data is based on evidence.

tangible results

Indicates that the results are concrete and perceptible.

measurable outcomes

Focuses on the ability to quantify the outcomes.

validated data

Implies that the data has been confirmed for accuracy.

confirmed outcomes

Highlights that the outcomes have been confirmed.

substantiated results

Indicates that the results are supported by evidence.

hard data

Uses a more informal term for factual and reliable data.

FAQs

How are "objective findings" used in research?

"Objective findings" are crucial in research to provide unbiased, verifiable data that supports or refutes hypotheses. They contrast with subjective reports, offering a factual basis for conclusions.

What's the difference between "objective findings" and subjective opinions?

"Objective findings" are based on measurable, verifiable data, while subjective opinions are personal beliefs or interpretations. Research relies on "objective findings" to ensure validity.

How do you ensure the reliability of "objective findings"?

Ensuring the reliability of "objective findings" involves using standardized measurement techniques, controlling for biases, and replicating results through multiple trials or studies.

Can "objective findings" be misinterpreted?

Yes, even "objective findings" can be misinterpreted if presented without proper context or if underlying assumptions are not clearly stated. Clear communication and thorough analysis are essential.