number of attackers

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "number of attackers" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the quantity of individuals involved in an attack, whether in a physical, digital, or metaphorical context. Example: "The police reported an increased number of attackers during the protest, leading to heightened security measures."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

Solid information about the attack was hard to come by, with differing reports about the number of attackers and the number of grenades.

The New York Times

The exact number of attackers remained unclear.

The New York Times

A number of attackers have come from Jabel Mukaber.

The Guardian

There were conflicting accounts about the number of attackers.

The New York Times

An unknown number of attackers were killed, he said; there were no American casualties.

The New York Times

He did not say what the total number of attackers had been.

The Washington Post

This time, an unknown number of attackers fired rocket-propelled grenades and assault rifles at the Americans.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

4 human-written examples

The revocation rate depends on the number of revocations made against node n i, as well as the number of attacker node n i made.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

However, it is also possible that the numbers of attackers will taper off.

The Washington Post

We show analytically and via simulation that, even in the presence of large numbers of attackers, our user-centric scheme significantly outperforms pure infrastructure-based approaches, where monitoring is carried out only by trusted Access Points.

Computer Networks

Moreover, the proposed system might be crashed if the numbers of attackers are higher than the numbers of normal nodes.

Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When reporting on incidents involving multiple aggressors, specify the "number of attackers" to provide clarity and avoid ambiguity, enhancing the accuracy of the information conveyed.

Common error

Refrain from using imprecise terms like "several" or "many" when the exact "number of attackers" is known. Providing a specific figure enhances the credibility and informative value of your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "number of attackers" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence or clause. It quantifies the individuals involved in an offensive action. Ludwig confirms its correct usage in diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Science

25%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "number of attackers" is a commonly used and grammatically sound noun phrase employed to quantify individuals engaged in offensive actions. Ludwig's analysis confirms its widespread use across diverse fields like news reporting, scientific research, and general informative writing. Its primary function is to provide clarity regarding the scale of an attack, maintaining a neutral register suitable for both formal and informal contexts. While alternatives exist, such as "count of assailants", the original phrase remains a direct and effective means of conveying this critical piece of information. With expert-validated grammar and diverse application, "number of attackers" is a valuable term in any writer's toolkit.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

count of assailants

Replaces "attackers" with "assailants", offering a more formal tone.

total of aggressors

Substitutes "number" with "total" and "attackers" with "aggressors", emphasizing the cumulative amount and their hostile role.

quantity of perpetrators

Employs "quantity" instead of "number" and "perpetrators" for "attackers", suitable in legal or investigative contexts.

headcount of invaders

Uses "headcount" to denote the number and "invaders" in place of "attackers", appropriate when describing an invasion or intrusion.

strength of the attacking force

Shifts the focus to the force itself, using "strength" to represent the numerical size of the attackers.

number of offensive parties

Replaces "attackers" with "offensive parties", providing a more neutral description.

amount of hostile agents

Substitutes "number" with "amount" and "attackers" with "hostile agents", suitable in intelligence or security contexts.

numerical size of the assault team

Specifies "numerical size" to indicate quantity and "assault team" instead of "attackers", offering clarity in military or tactical discussions.

volume of raiders

Uses "volume" to suggest the number and "raiders" for "attackers", appropriate when describing a raid or looting event.

magnitude of the attacking group

Employs "magnitude" to express the size and "attacking group" instead of "attackers", focusing on the group's overall impact.

FAQs

How do I correctly use "number of attackers" in a sentence?

Use "number of attackers" to specify the quantity of individuals involved in an assault or offensive action. For example, "The police confirmed the "number of attackers" was three".

What's a more formal alternative to "number of attackers"?

A more formal alternative would be "count of assailants", which is suitable for official reports or academic papers.

Is it better to say "amount of attackers" or "number of attackers"?

It's generally more appropriate to use ""number of attackers"", as "number" is preferred when referring to countable items, while "amount" is used for uncountable quantities.

What details should I include when reporting the "number of attackers"?

Whenever possible, specify the exact "number of attackers", their methods, and any related information that helps to clarify the event.