noticeably absent

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "noticeably absent" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe someone or something that is clearly missing or not present in a particular context. Example: "During the meeting, several key stakeholders were noticeably absent, which raised concerns about the project's future."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Most noticeably absent?

The New York Times - Sports

Mr. Minor was noticeably absent.

The New York Times - Arts

"Those connections are noticeably absent".

The New York Times

Crime is relatively under control, political violence noticeably absent.

The New York Times

Noticeably absent from court yesterday was Mrs. Kozlowski.

The New York Times

Lehman Brothers was noticeably absent from the talks.

The New York Times

Noticeably absent was Houston's mother, Cissy, and her brother Gary.

Independent

Noticeably absent were complaints about the increase in opinion pieces.

The New York Times

Mr. Russell is noticeably absent from the sequel.

The New York Times

Just Blaze, who produced most of the first album, is noticeably absent throughout "Free at Last".

The New York Times - Arts

Rear air vents were also noticeably absent — and especially missed during several extremely hot summer days.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider stronger synonyms if you want to emphasize the absence even more. For example, use "glaringly absent" if something’s absence is especially striking.

Common error

Avoid using "noticeably absent" when the absence is subtle or only detectable upon close inspection. This phrase implies a clear and easily observed lack of something.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "noticeably absent" functions as an adjective phrase, modifying a noun or pronoun to describe something or someone missing in an obvious way. Ludwig AI validates this usage, providing numerous examples across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

81%

Science

10%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "noticeably absent" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to describe something that is clearly missing. Ludwig AI confirms that it functions as an adjective phrase, emphasizing the obvious lack of an element. Its neutral tone and wide applicability make it suitable for diverse contexts, particularly in news and media. When using the phrase, ensure that the context clearly indicates what is expected but is not present. If a stronger emphasis is needed, consider synonyms like "conspicuously missing" or "glaringly missing".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

conspicuously missing

Emphasizes that the absence is very obvious and easily seen.

markedly absent

Highlights the absence as being distinct and easily noticeable.

plainly missing

Indicates that the absence is clear and evident.

visibly absent

Focuses on the fact that the absence is something that can be seen.

evidently missing

Suggests the absence is apparent and can be inferred.

clearly absent

Highlights that the absence is unambiguous and easily understood.

patently missing

Emphasizes that the absence is undeniable and obvious.

distinctly absent

Indicates the absence is sharply defined and not subtle.

glaringly missing

Highlights the absence as being extremely obvious, perhaps to a fault.

ostensibly absent

Suggests that the absence is apparent but might not be entirely genuine.

FAQs

How can I use "noticeably absent" in a sentence?

You can use "noticeably absent" to describe something or someone that is clearly missing or not present. For example, "The main course was good, but the salt was "noticeably absent"" or "Several key speakers were "noticeably absent" from the conference".

What are some alternatives to the phrase "noticeably absent"?

Alternatives include "conspicuously missing", "markedly absent", "plainly missing", or "visibly absent". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is "noticeably absent" grammatically correct?

Yes, "noticeably absent" is grammatically correct. It's a common and accepted way to describe something that is clearly not present.

What is the difference between "noticeably absent" and "notably absent"?

While both phrases are similar, "notably absent" suggests that the absence is significant or worthy of attention, whereas "noticeably absent" simply means that the absence is easily observed. "Notably absent" carries a stronger implication of importance than "noticeably absent".