Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

nothing was lost

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "nothing was lost" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that no valuable items, information, or opportunities were sacrificed or diminished in a particular situation. Example: "Despite the challenges we faced during the project, nothing was lost in terms of our team's morale and dedication."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

20 human-written examples

Nothing was lost.

News & Media

The New York Times

Nothing was lost, though.

News & Media

The Economist

Best of all, nothing was lost.

News & Media

The New York Times

This time, nothing was lost in translation.

No, apparently nothing was lost in translation.

News & Media

The New York Times

"Nothing was lost," we read in the first story.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

36 human-written examples

Henry James's dictum, "Try to be one of those people on whom nothing is lost," is invoked by Mr. McInerney sardonically in "Everything Is Lost".

There's nothing being lost there".

News & Media

The New Yorker

Nothing is lost on her.

Something is lost when nothing is lost.

And the universe of patheoremon granithat light as lattice, lacework, loose weave, a dress knothinglisht Madame Cézanne wears, skein unravelostg, nakedness inside — bedazzlostnt — his complostted friend —      surface and depth, grazing mouth on stone, lostt's lost kiss, lostt's ripplostunrulostwater unspoolost, spoolost down from the mountain, threads weaving together,      coming undone . . .

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "nothing was lost" to convey a sense of completeness or lack of negative impact, especially after a challenge or transition.

Common error

Avoid using "nothing was lost" in situations where some negative impact is expected or natural. It can sound unrealistic or dismissive if used too broadly. Instead, consider a more nuanced phrase that acknowledges both gains and losses.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "nothing was lost" functions as a declarative statement indicating the absence of any negative impact or loss. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically sound and widely used.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Formal & Business

15%

Science

10%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "nothing was lost" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to indicate the absence of negative consequences or the preservation of value. According to Ludwig AI, it is widely accepted and suitable for various contexts, particularly in news and media. While versatile, it's important to avoid overuse in situations where some loss is expected. Alternatives like "no harm was done" or "everything was preserved" can provide nuanced options. In essence, "nothing was lost" serves to reassure or emphasize a positive outcome, conveying completeness and stability.

FAQs

What does "nothing was lost" mean?

The phrase "nothing was lost" means that there were no negative consequences or sacrifices in a particular situation. Everything of value was preserved or retained.

What can I say instead of "nothing was lost"?

You can use alternatives like "no harm was done", "everything was preserved", or "all was saved" depending on the context.

Is "nothing was lost" grammatically correct?

Yes, "nothing was lost" is grammatically correct. It follows standard English sentence structure with a subject ("nothing"), verb ("was"), and past participle ("lost").

How to use "nothing was lost" in a sentence?

Example: "Despite the fire, "nothing was lost" because of the quick response from the fire department." Another example: "Although the negotiations were tough, "nothing was lost" in terms of our core values."

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: