not without limitations

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'not without limitations' is correct and usable in written English.
It is usually used to express the idea that something has both advantages and disadvantages or that something is possible but not without certain restrictions. For example: "We can go ahead with the project, but not without limitations – we need to make sure to stay within our budget."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But PulseNet is not without limitations.

MIT Technology Review

This study is not without limitations.

Nature

Our conclusions are not without limitations.

Nature

But chemical recycling is not without limitations.

Nature

This study was not without limitations.

Nature

Nevertheless, our in vitro engineering approach is not without limitations.

Nature

Of course, drugs safety testing is not without limitations.

The Guardian

Our study was not without limitations.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

However, our study was not without limitations.

Annals of Intensive Care

The present study was not without limitations.

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics

The current experiment was not without limitations.

Brain Informatics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "not without limitations", clearly state what those limitations are to provide context and avoid ambiguity. For example, "The study provides valuable insights, but is not without limitations: the sample size was relatively small."

Common error

Avoid using "not without limitations" without specifying what the limitations are. Vague statements weaken your argument and leave room for misinterpretation. Be specific and clear about the constraints or drawbacks you're referring to.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not without limitations" functions as a qualifier, typically used to acknowledge potential weaknesses or restrictions associated with a particular subject, study, or approach. Ludwig AI indicates its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

74%

News & Media

12%

Formal & Business

14%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "not without limitations" serves as a balanced qualifier, acknowledging both strengths and weaknesses. Predominantly found in science and news contexts, it maintains a neutral to formal register. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's correctness, emphasizing its use to introduce potential drawbacks before detailing specifics. When employing this phrase, clarity is key: specify the limitations to enhance understanding and avoid vagueness. Consider alternatives like "subject to constraints" or "not without drawbacks" to offer nuanced perspectives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not without drawbacks

Directly points out the disadvantages or negative aspects associated with something.

not without imperfections

Acknowledges the presence of flaws or shortcomings.

subject to constraints

Emphasizes the presence of restrictions or limitations affecting something.

has some deficiencies

Highlights that something has some lacks or incompleteness

with certain caveats

Highlights the need for specific conditions or qualifications to be considered.

having certain restrictions

Highlights that something is conditional on some kind of constraints.

with inherent weaknesses

Focuses on the built-in flaws or vulnerabilities present in something.

with acknowledged shortcomings

Highlights openly admitted deficiencies or limitations.

not entirely unproblematic

Indicates the existence of issues or difficulties, albeit not overwhelmingly so.

comes with conditions

It underlines the conditional feature associated with the phrase.

FAQs

How can I use "not without limitations" in a sentence?

Use "not without limitations" to acknowledge drawbacks or constraints while still recognizing value. For instance, "The proposed solution is innovative, but "not without limitations" – it requires significant initial investment".

What phrases are similar to "not without limitations"?

Similar phrases include "subject to constraints", "with certain caveats", or "not without drawbacks", which all suggest that something has inherent restrictions or disadvantages.

Is it better to say "not without limitations" or specify the limitations directly?

Specifying the limitations directly is generally better for clarity. However, ""not without limitations"" can be useful as a concise way to introduce the topic before detailing specific issues.

What's the difference between "not without limitations" and "flawed"?

"Not without limitations" is a softer way of acknowledging imperfections. "Flawed" implies a more significant defect, while ""not without limitations"" simply suggests there are constraints or drawbacks.