not without implications

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not without implications" is correct and usable in written English.
It is generally used to signify that something has consequences or meanings attached to it and could be used in a wide variety of contexts. For example: "The finding of oil in this area is not without implications - it could have a significant impact on the local economy."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

But, he added, "It's not without implications in an aging society".

The New York Times

Yet while their services are giving many people their first opportunity to get online, it's not without implications.

TechCrunch

The choice of one or multiple reference wild-type strain(s) is therefore not without implications for the future of the field and should be carefully investigated.

F1000Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

In short, by the time of Copernicus and Galileo in the 16th century, a fairly broad substratum of physical science existed, largely empirical but not without theoretical implications on which the edifice of modern physical science could be built.

Encyclopedia Britannica

It's certainly complicated, and not without negative implications for Western governments.

BBC

Thus, contamination of agricultural soils with metals can pose long-term environmental problems, and is not without health implications (Ferguson 1990; Chopra et al. 2009).

International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture

The authors conclude that while it is possible to adapt the model to extract quantities according to existing specifications for manual-based measurements, the adjustments are not without its implications in other model applications such as visualization or drawings.

Automation in Construction

Such speculations were not without their implications for the traditional Olympian pantheon; Xenophanes clearly intends to mock the cultural relativity of anthropomorphism, pointing out that different races of humans depict their gods in their own image, and suggesting that if horses and cattle could draw they would do the same (DK 21B15 16).

SEP

The findings of the analysis are not without certain implications.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Female authors of the time may not have been publicly threatened with rape — although the variety of disrespect they might expect to receive was similarly dismissive, and not without an implication of sexual denigration.

The New Yorker

It does not happen in the absence of the offender, and it is not without practical implication.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "not without implications" to subtly introduce the idea that an action or decision will have consequences that should be considered, rather than directly stating those consequences.

Common error

Avoid using "not without implications" when the implications are glaringly obvious. It can come across as redundant or patronizing to your audience. Instead, directly address the implications.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not without implications" functions as a hedge or understatement, suggesting that a particular action, event, or situation has consequences or ramifications, though not necessarily specifying what those consequences are. Ludwig AI confirms the correctness of this phrase.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

33%

Encyclopedias

32%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "not without implications" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression that subtly indicates the presence of consequences or significance. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. It functions as a hedge, prompting consideration of potential ramifications across various contexts, from news and science to encyclopedic entries. While versatile, it's important to use it judiciously, avoiding redundancy when the implications are already apparent. Related phrases like "with some consequences" or "having certain ramifications" can offer alternative shades of meaning. Understanding when to use the phrase effectively can enhance the nuance and depth of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not devoid of consequences

Emphasizes the presence of consequences by negating the absence of them.

not lacking significance

Emphasizes the importance of something by stating it is not without meaning.

with some consequences

Replaces negation with affirmation, emphasizing the existence of consequences.

having certain ramifications

Substitutes "implications" with "ramifications", indicating possible results, often complex or unwelcome.

entailing some effects

Replaces implications with 'effects', pointing to direct results from a cause.

carrying potential weight

Highlights the importance or significance that implications may carry.

involving certain outcomes

Shifts focus to the results or conclusions that may stem from implications.

bearing some relevance

Focuses on the connection and significance of the implications to a particular matter.

presenting certain challenges

Highlights the difficulties or obstacles that might arise from the implications.

posing potential questions

Underscores the uncertainty or inquiries that the implications might bring about.

FAQs

How can I use "not without implications" in a sentence?

You can use "not without implications" to subtly suggest that a particular action, decision, or situation has consequences that merit consideration. For example, "Implementing this new policy is "not without implications" for employee morale".

What are some alternatives to "not without implications"?

Alternatives include "with some consequences", "having certain ramifications", or "entailing some effects", depending on the specific shade of meaning you want to convey.

Is it better to say "not without implications" or directly state the implications?

It depends on the context. "Not without implications" can be useful when you want to hint at consequences without explicitly detailing them, perhaps to encourage further thought or discussion. Stating the implications directly is more appropriate when clarity and directness are paramount.

What's the difference between "not without implications" and "without implications"?

"Not without implications" indicates that consequences exist, whereas "without implications" suggests that something has no consequences or effects. The former implies caution or consideration, while the latter implies a lack of impact.