not without flaws

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not without flaws" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has imperfections or shortcomings, while still having some positive qualities. Example: "The novel was engaging and well-written, but it was not without flaws, particularly in its pacing."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He is not without flaws.

The Economist

Charter schools are not without flaws.

The New York Times

The election was not without flaws.

The New York Times

Mr Uribe is not without flaws.

The Economist

The book is not without flaws.

The Guardian - Opinion

The program is not without flaws.

The New York Times - Arts

Nevertheless, the album is not without flaws.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

But it is not without flaws.

The Guardian - Books

Johnson's study is not without flaws.

The New York Times - Books

He's clearly a genius, although not without flaws.

The New Yorker

It was a promising start, though not without flaws.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "not without flaws", follow it with a specific explanation or example of the flaw to provide context and clarity for the reader. For example: "The design is innovative, but not without flaws; the battery life is considerably shorter than competitors".

Common error

Avoid using "not without flaws" as a mere disclaimer. If the flaws significantly outweigh the positive aspects, consider using a more direct and critical assessment instead. It's misleading to downplay serious issues with this phrase.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not without flaws" functions as a qualifier or hedge. It acknowledges imperfections in a subject while implying that it still has positive qualities. Ludwig indicates this expression is grammatically sound and usable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

79%

Science

10%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "not without flaws" serves as a balanced acknowledgement of imperfections alongside positive attributes. According to Ludwig, the expression is grammatically correct and suitable for use in written English. Predominantly found in news and media, its usage extends to scientific and wiki contexts, indicating a broad applicability. This phrase effectively communicates a nuanced perspective, preventing overly positive or negative portrayals. When employing this expression, it's best practice to specify the flaws to provide context. Common errors involve exaggerating positives when the flaws are significant. Related phrases include "not without its shortcomings" and "not without its imperfections".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not without its shortcomings

Replaces "flaws" with "shortcomings", emphasizing minor deficiencies.

not without its imperfections

Uses "imperfections" instead of "flaws", suggesting a lack of flawlessness.

is not devoid of defects

Emphasizes the presence of faults using a more formal tone.

is not entirely perfect

Directly states that something is not flawless.

is somewhat imperfect

Acknowledges flaws while suggesting they are not overwhelming.

has its limitations

Focuses on the constraints or boundaries of something, rather than specific defects.

possesses some deficiencies

Indicates lacks or inadequacies in something.

exhibits some weaknesses

Highlights vulnerabilities or frailties, rather than outright errors.

has certain drawbacks

Draws attention to disadvantages or negative aspects.

displays a few faults

Points out minor errors or failings.

FAQs

How can I use "not without flaws" in a sentence?

Use "not without flaws" to acknowledge imperfections while still highlighting positive aspects. For example: "The movie was entertaining, but "not without flaws"; the plot had several inconsistencies".

What are some alternatives to "not without flaws"?

Alternatives include "not without its shortcomings", "not without its imperfections", or "has its limitations" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "not without flaws" or "imperfect"?

"Imperfect" is a more direct and general way to describe something with flaws. "Not without flaws" suggests a more balanced view, acknowledging both positive and negative aspects. The best choice depends on the desired emphasis.

What does it mean when someone says something is "not without flaws"?

It means that while the subject in question has positive qualities or strengths, it also possesses some weaknesses, imperfections, or shortcomings.