not without faults

USAGE SUMMARY

"not without faults" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used to express that something, such as a person, situation, or object, is not perfect, despite having features or aspects that may be perceived as desirable. Example: He was a great leader, but not without faults.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

20 human-written examples

But he is not without faults.

The Economist

Her voice is not without faults.

The New York Times - Arts

The show is not without faults.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Technically, she was not without faults.

The New York Times - Arts

"I am not without faults and I am far short of perfect".

Independent

For the record, Flores has performed admirably at Watford, but not without faults.

The Guardian - Sport

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

40 human-written examples

State governments are not without fault.

The New York Times

Khannouchi is not without fault.

The New York Times - Sports

He is not at all a perfect player, and he is not without fault.

The New York Times

"I am not without fault and I am far short of perfect," it added.

Independent

Last year the IPCC found the police not without fault in the 2008 shooting of an armed but deranged lawyer in London.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "not without faults", follow it with specific examples to provide context and credibility to your assessment.

Common error

Avoid simply stating something is "not without faults" without providing context or specific examples. This can make your statement seem vague and unhelpful. Always follow with details to support your assessment.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not without faults" functions as a qualifier, indicating that while something may possess positive attributes, it also has imperfections. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Science

20%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "not without faults" serves as a balanced qualifier, acknowledging imperfections while implying the presence of positive qualities. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, making it suitable for various contexts, particularly in news, science, and academic writing. While direct, the phrase maintains a level of formality suitable for professional or academic discourse. To ensure effective usage, always provide specific examples to support the assertion. Consider alternatives like "has its imperfections" or "not devoid of shortcomings" for variety.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

isn't flawless

A more direct way to say something is not perfect.

not entirely perfect

Emphasizes the lack of complete flawlessness.

has its downsides

Focuses on the negative aspects or drawbacks.

has its imperfections

This alternative uses different vocabulary to convey the presence of flaws.

not without limitations

Uses a different noun to convey a similar meaning.

has some weaknesses

This alternative directly points out areas of deficiency.

possesses some flaws

Emphasizes the presence of defects or imperfections.

not devoid of shortcomings

This phrase uses more formal language to express a similar idea.

marked by imperfections

This alternative suggests the imperfections are noticeable.

with certain limitations

Highlights restrictions or boundaries.

FAQs

How can I use "not without faults" in a sentence?

You can use "not without faults" to acknowledge that something or someone has imperfections despite having positive qualities. For example, "The system is efficient, but "not without faults"."

What are some alternative phrases to "not without faults"?

Alternatives include phrases like "has its imperfections", "not devoid of shortcomings", or "has some weaknesses" depending on the context.

What does "not without faults" mean?

The phrase "not without faults" means that something or someone is not perfect and has some imperfections or flaws.

Is it better to say "not without faults" or "imperfect"?

Both "not without faults" and "imperfect" are acceptable, but "not without faults" may be preferred when you want to acknowledge imperfections while also implying the presence of positive qualities. "Imperfect" is more direct and simply states the existence of flaws.