not without controversy

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not without controversy" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to indicate that something is subject to controversy, debate, or disagreement. For example: "The president's decision to launch a military intervention in the region was not without controversy."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Not without controversy, then?

The Guardian - Sport

But not without controversy.

The Guardian - Film

However, his career was not without controversy.

Independent

But it is not without controversy.

The New York Times

The program was not without controversy.

The New York Times

Mr. Stern's tenure was not without controversy.

The New York Times

Vang's career was not without controversy.

Independent

Yet those programs are not without controversy.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The field is not without controversy.

The New York Times

Glogg is also not without controversy.

The New York Times - Magazine

The winning goal was not without controversy.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "not without controversy", ensure the context clearly indicates the nature of the controversy. Briefly allude to the core reasons or differing viewpoints to provide a fuller understanding for the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "not without controversy" for minor disagreements or trivial matters. Save it for situations involving substantial debate, ethical considerations, or significant opposing viewpoints to maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not without controversy" functions as an adverbial phrase, modifying a verb or clause to indicate the presence of disagreement or contention surrounding a particular subject. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in expressing that something is subject to debate, as illustrated in numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

88%

Encyclopedias

6%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Science

1%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "not without controversy" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to indicate that a subject or action is accompanied by disagreement or debate. As Ludwig AI confirms, it functions as an adverbial phrase, often softening the introduction of contentious issues in news, encyclopedias, and general discussions. When using this phrase, consider briefly alluding to the reasons behind the controversy to provide context. Alternatives such as ""controversial"" or ""subject to debate"" can be used depending on the desired nuance. Avoid using it for trivial disagreements to maintain credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

controversial

Directly states that the subject is likely to cause controversy.

contentious

Emphasizes the tendency to cause arguments or disputes.

subject to debate

Focuses on the aspect of discussion and differing opinions.

subject of disagreement

Directly states the presence of conflicting opinions.

disputed

Highlights the aspect of active disagreement or challenge.

debatable

Suggests the issue is open to different interpretations and arguments.

polemical

Indicates that the subject is likely to provoke strong opinions and heated debate.

open to question

Indicates that the validity or truth of something is uncertain.

questionable

Suggests doubt or uncertainty about the validity or appropriateness of something.

under scrutiny

Focuses on the aspect of being closely and critically examined.

FAQs

How can I use "not without controversy" in a sentence?

You can use "not without controversy" to indicate that a particular action, decision, or event is subject to debate or disagreement. For example, "The new policy was "not without controversy" among the employees".

What are some alternatives to "not without controversy"?

Alternatives include "controversial", "subject to debate", or "disputed". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it better to say "controversial" or "not without controversy"?

Both are valid, but "not without controversy" can sometimes soften the statement, suggesting that while there is controversy, it might not be the defining characteristic. "Controversial" is more direct.

Which is correct, "not without controversy" or "without controversy"?

"Without controversy" means there is no controversy. "Not without controversy" indicates that controversy exists. They have opposite meanings.