not wide

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not wide" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that lacks width or is narrower than expected or desired. Example: "The hallway is not wide enough to accommodate two people walking side by side."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

50 human-written examples

His style vocabulary is not wide.

The New York Times - Arts

His interests were not wide enough".

The New York Times - Arts

It's not wide, but it is sandy.

The New York Times - Travel

It is "Wide Angle Saxon," not "Wide Angle Open Saxon".

The New York Times

However, the political system is not wide open.

The Guardian - Opinion

WINE LIST Deep but not wide with about 60 picks.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

10 human-written examples

First, small is beautiful: think macro, not wide-angle.

Independent

This tiny ski resort, hard to reach even in summer, is not wide-open Seattle.

The New York Times

"There is something kind of hilariously not wide-eyed about her," Silverman says.

The New Yorker

Still, she's not wide-eyed about winning over loads of converts to public education.

The New York Times

This year's festival is nothing if not wide-ranging, with 10 shows that range across venues in 13 London boroughs.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing physical dimensions, ensure "not wide" is followed by a unit of measurement or a comparative reference for clarity. For instance, "The path is not wide enough for two cars."

Common error

Avoid using "not wide" when you actually mean "not comprehensive" or "not in-depth". "Not wide" refers to physical dimension, while "not comprehensive" refers to scope or coverage.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not wide" functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying nouns to indicate a lack of width or breadth. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used. It is used to describe physical dimensions and can also be applied figuratively to concepts like scope or range.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "not wide" is a versatile and grammatically sound adjectival phrase used to denote a lack of width or breadth. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in various contexts. It is most frequently encountered in news, science, and wiki articles, serving a descriptive purpose. While alternatives like "narrow" or "thin" exist, "not wide" provides a straightforward way to express limited dimensions. Remember to consider the context to ensure accurate usage, avoiding confusion between physical width and scope. This phrase is a valuable addition to any writer's toolkit for precise and clear communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

narrow

Replaces the entire phrase with a single word indicating a small width.

not broad

Substitutes "wide" with its direct antonym "broad", maintaining a similar structure.

thin

Implies a small dimension in one direction, similar to narrow.

limited in width

Expands on the original phrase to explicitly state the limitation.

not extensive

Focuses on the lack of expanse rather than just physical width.

small in breadth

Uses a more formal synonym for width, emphasizing limited scope.

lacking width

Directly states the absence of width.

of limited scope

Shifts the focus to a limited range or extent, which can relate to width in some contexts.

close together

Describes elements that are near each other because the space between them is not wide.

compact

Describes something that takes up little space, implying it's not wide.

FAQs

How can I use "not wide" in a sentence?

You can use "not wide" to describe something that lacks width. For example, "The river is "not wide" enough to swim across easily."

What's a good alternative to saying "not wide"?

Alternatives include "narrow", "thin", or "not broad", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "not widely" instead of "not wide" in certain situations?

Yes, "not widely" is correct when referring to the extent or scope of something, rather than its physical width. For instance, "The idea is "not widely" accepted."

What is the difference between "not wide" and "not wide enough"?

"Not wide" simply states a lack of width, while "not wide enough" implies that the lack of width is insufficient for a particular purpose or need. For example, "The door is "not wide"" versus "The door is "not wide enough" for the furniture to fit through."