not well established

USAGE SUMMARY

'not well established' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a situation that is not firmly grounded and not supported by evidence or accepted in a particular area. For example, "The risks associated with the new drug are not well established."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The extent of this practice, however, is not well established.

University of California, Berkeley

The pathophysiological mechanisms of status epilepticus are not well established.

NeuroImage

However, quantitative evaluation of these mutants was not well established.

Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

The internship culture in Russia is not well established.

Independent

But none of them speak fluent English and the business is not well established.

The Guardian

And, with few prosecutions, the legal precedents are not well established.

The New Yorker

This is a brave new world – visitor mobile museum preferences are not well established.

The Guardian

It is toxic, although the fatal dosage is not well established.

Britannica

"The decrease in fecundity of females in these circumstances is not well established.

The Guardian

The list does not include protocarnivorous species or those that are not well established as carnivorous.

Britannica

Especially in an environment in which mediation is not well established.

Harvard University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "not well established", ensure the context clearly indicates what is lacking in establishment, such as evidence, acceptance, or foundation.

Common error

Avoid using "not well established" without specifying why something isn't well established. Be precise about what kind of support or validation is missing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not well established" functions as an adjective phrase that modifies a noun, indicating that something lacks sufficient evidence, validation, or widespread acceptance. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage and applicability across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

71%

News & Media

15%

Academia

14%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "not well established" is a grammatically correct and very common phrase used to express that something lacks a strong foundation, sufficient evidence, or widespread acceptance. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. Predominantly found in scientific, news media, and academic contexts, it maintains a neutral to formal register. When using this phrase, ensure you specify what aspects are not well established to avoid vagueness. Consider alternatives like "poorly established" or "remains to be established" for nuanced meaning. This comprehensive analysis provides practical guidance and addresses common queries related to the usage of "not well established".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

poorly established

Replaces "well" with its antonym "poorly", indicating a weaker state of being established.

not firmly established

Substitutes "well" with "firmly", emphasizing the lack of stability or certainty.

not fully established

Uses "fully" instead of "well" to highlight the incompleteness of the establishment.

not properly established

Replaces "well" with "properly", focusing on the inadequacy of the establishment process.

not securely established

Emphasizes the lack of security or safety in the establishment.

not soundly established

Highlights the absence of a solid foundation for the establishment.

not thoroughly established

Stresses the lack of comprehensive or complete establishment.

not completely established

Similar to "not fully established", but emphasizes the absolute lack of completion.

remains to be established

Indicates that the establishment process is still pending or uncertain.

lacks solid grounding

Shifts the phrasing to emphasize the absence of a strong base or foundation.

FAQs

How can I use "not well established" in a sentence?

You can use "not well established" to indicate that something lacks sufficient evidence, support, or recognition. For example, "The link between diet and cancer is "not well established"."

What are some alternatives to saying "not well established"?

Alternatives include "poorly established", "not firmly established", or "remains to be established", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "not well established" or "poorly established"?

Both "not well established" and "poorly established" are acceptable, but "not well established" is often preferred in formal or scientific writing. The best choice depends on the specific context and the level of formality.

What does it mean when something is described as "not well established"?

When something is described as "not well established", it means that it lacks a strong foundation, has limited evidence, or is not widely accepted within a particular field or context. This can apply to theories, practices, or relationships.