not very robust

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not very robust" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that lacks strength, durability, or effectiveness in various contexts, such as technology, arguments, or systems. Example: "The software's performance is not very robust, leading to frequent crashes during peak usage."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

In contrast, Th1-Th2 and Tr function were not very robust (robustness = 0.27 and 0.21 respectively, Table 4), indicating that T-cell fate after activation is less fixed and that it is more sensitive to stochastic events or environmental signals [2].

Plosone

The robustness test also showed that MI256 in not very robust to noise.

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

The procedure is not very robust and requires special attention to give acceptable results.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

"If you actually read what these policies say, they are not very robust," Professor Fried said.

The New York Times

However, it is not very robust to parameter uncertainties and external disturbances.

Journal of the Franklin Institute

"The earlier studies were not very robust," said Mr. Easterly, who with others reviewed much of Mr. Slemrod's work.

The New York Times

However, they are not very robust since their walls are as thin as the walls of soap bubbles.

Nature

It is known that this process is not very robust and requires frequent tuning to achieve acceptable yields.

Neurocomputing

These changes, not related to the analyte concentration, may yield in complex and not very robust calibration models.

Analytica Chimica Acta

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

They are too complex and the visuals they generate aren't very robust or interactive.

Harvard Business Review

"The economy is slowing down and it wasn't very robust to begin with".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "not very robust", consider the specific aspect of weakness you want to emphasize: physical strength, reliability, or resilience. Choose synonyms that better reflect the intended meaning.

Common error

In highly formal or technical writing, avoid overly general phrases like "not very robust". Instead, specify the deficiency: "susceptible to interference", "lacking precision", or "prone to failure" for greater clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not very robust" functions as a descriptive adjective phrase, modifying a noun to indicate a lack of strength, durability, or effectiveness. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

69%

News & Media

22%

Academia

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "not very robust" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe something that lacks strength, durability, or effectiveness. Ludwig AI confirms its usability and correctness. As evidenced by Ludwig, it appears frequently in scientific, news, and academic contexts, making it a versatile phrase for expressing qualified weakness. When using this phrase, consider the specific context and choose synonyms or more precise language if a higher degree of formality or technical accuracy is required. Be mindful of overuse, and strive for clarity by specifying the particular aspect in which something is deficient.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not particularly strong

Directly addresses the lack of physical or metaphorical strength.

not especially resilient

Emphasizes the lack of ability to recover quickly from difficulties or setbacks.

rather unstable

Focuses on the lack of stability and potential for unpredictable behavior or failure.

not terribly durable

Focuses on the lack of long-lasting quality or resistance to wear and tear.

somewhat fragile

Indicates a degree of vulnerability or delicacy, implying susceptibility to damage.

fairly delicate

Implies a need for careful handling due to susceptibility to damage or failure.

somewhat unreliable

Highlights the lack of dependability or trustworthiness.

moderately vulnerable

Indicates a degree of susceptibility to harm or negative impacts.

slightly deficient

Underlines the small lack of some necessary quality or element.

inadequate in some respects

Emphasizes the insufficiency of some qualities.

FAQs

What does "not very robust" mean?

The phrase "not very robust" generally means something is "not very strong", durable, or effective. It suggests a degree of weakness or fragility.

How can I use "not very robust" in a sentence?

You can use "not very robust" to describe anything from a system's performance to an argument's validity. For example: "The experimental design was "not very robust" in this way."

What are some alternatives to saying "not very robust"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "somewhat fragile", "rather unstable", or "not particularly strong".

Is it better to say "not robust" or "not very robust"?

"Not robust" implies a complete lack of robustness, while ""not very robust"" suggests a partial lack. The choice depends on the degree of weakness you want to convey.