not under

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not under" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something does not fall within a certain condition or category. Example: "The project is not under review at this time."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Why not under?

The Economist

NOT under my roof.

The New York Times

Not under current law.

The New York Times

Repeat, not under investigation!

The New York Times

Surely not under the city.

The New Yorker

"It is not under threat.

The New York Times

Chelsea were not under pressure.

Independent

We are not under pressure".

The New York Times

Not under Thatcher.

The Guardian - Books

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

Not under-owned but unowned.

Forbes

Do not "under-revise" either.

WikiHow

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To provide a more formal and academic tone, use alternatives like "not subjected to" or "exempt from", depending on the context.

Common error

Avoid assuming the reader understands what isn't covered by "not under". Always clarify the limits. Instead of simply stating "It's not under review", specify "The project is not under review at this time, but will be revisited next quarter."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not under" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase that negates a condition, state, or influence. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a correct and usable construction in English. Examples show its use across varied contexts, such as "not under investigation" or "not under pressure."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

80%

Wiki

15%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Science

1%

Academia

0%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "not under" is a versatile and correct way to express that something is not subject to a particular condition or influence, a fact supported by Ludwig AI. It is frequently used in news and media to provide clarity on the status of subjects. While grammatically sound and widely applicable, it is important to ensure the context is clear to avoid ambiguity. Consider alternatives like "not subject to" in more formal settings, and always specify what the subject is not under to enhance clarity. Common errors involve assuming the reader knows the implied condition, so explicit clarification is always best.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not subjected to

Replaces "under" with "subjected to", emphasizing lack of obligation or constraint.

exempt from

Indicates a state of being excused or not required to adhere to something.

free from

Indicates a state of being unburdened or liberated from a specific influence.

unaffected by

Stresses the absence of influence or impact from something else.

not beneath

Uses "beneath" as an alternative to "under", suggesting a lack of direct covering or control.

not influenced by

Highlights that something is not being changed or affected by something else.

outside the scope of

Highlights that something falls beyond the defined limits or boundaries.

not governed by

Implies a lack of regulation or control from a governing body or principle.

not experiencing

Focuses on the absence of a particular experience or condition.

not going through

Focuses on the absence of an experience or process.

FAQs

What does "not under" mean in a legal context?

In a legal context, "not under" typically means something is not subject to a particular law, regulation, or jurisdiction. For instance, "This activity is "not under" federal regulation" indicates that federal laws do not govern the activity.

How to use "not under" correctly in a sentence?

To use "not under" correctly, ensure you clearly specify what the subject is not under. For example, instead of saying "It is "not under"", clarify with "The contract is "not under" review at this time".

What can I say instead of "not under"?

You can use alternatives like "not subject to", "exempt from", or "outside the scope of" depending on the specific context. Each alternative conveys a slightly different nuance, so choose the one that best fits your intended meaning.

Is it better to use "not under" or "not subject to"?

The choice between "not under" and "not subject to" depends on the context. "Not under" is more general and can apply to various conditions or influences. "Not subject to" is more formal and often used in legal or regulatory contexts to indicate something is not governed by a specific rule or law.