not the same as formerly

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not the same as formerly" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something has changed from a previous state or condition. Example: "The company's policies are not the same as formerly, reflecting the new management's approach."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Was not the same as outside.

The New York Times

Candor is not the same as catharsis.

The New York Times - Arts

Need is not the same as strategy.

Independent

Trust is not the same as faith.

The New York Times - Magazine

This is not the same as approval.

The Economist

Anteriority is not the same as superiority.

The New Yorker

This is not the same as size.

The Economist

Sanctions are not the same as discipline.

Independent

It's not the same as Simpson - Bowles

The New York Times

not the same as listening.

University of California, Berkeley

Simple is not the same as easy.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "not the same as formerly", ensure the context clearly establishes what the prior state was for effective communication.

Common error

Avoid using "not the same as formerly" without specifying the points of difference; clarity ensures the comparison is meaningful to your audience.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not the same as formerly" functions as a comparative statement, indicating that a subject has undergone change and differs from its previous state. It is used to express that something is different now than it was in the past, based on Ludwig AI analysis.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "not the same as formerly" is a grammatically sound phrase used to express that something has changed from its prior condition. While flagged by Ludwig AI as correct, this expression is not particularly common, and there were no exact examples from the provided data. It serves to indicate a difference or transformation. More common alternatives include "different than before" or "no longer as it was". Usage should be considered in contexts where conveying change from a previous state is important, but simpler alternatives may often be preferred for clarity and modern usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

different than before

Emphasizes the difference from a past state using simpler wording.

no longer as it was

Highlights the cessation of a past condition.

has changed from its original state

Focuses on the alteration from the initial condition.

altered from its prior form

Indicates a transformation from a previous structure.

unlike it used to be

Emphasizes the distinction between the current and past conditions in a more conversational tone.

bears no resemblance to its past

Stresses a significant divergence from the previous state.

evolved from its earlier iteration

Highlights the evolutionary aspect of the change.

modified from its initial version

Focuses on the modification of the original version.

transformed from what it once was

Indicates a complete change from a previous state.

devolved since the previous instance

Indicates an ongoing process and transformation from a previous state.

FAQs

How can I use "not the same as formerly" in a sentence?

You can use "not the same as formerly" to indicate that something has changed from a previous state. For example, "The company's policies are "not the same as formerly", reflecting the new management's approach."

What alternatives can I use instead of "not the same as formerly"?

Consider alternatives such as "different than before", "no longer as it was", or "has changed from its original state" to convey a similar meaning but with slightly different nuances.

Is it more appropriate to use "not the same as formerly" or "different than before"?

While both phrases convey a change from a past state, "different than before" is generally more common and straightforward. "Not the same as formerly" can sound more formal or archaic.

What's the difference between "not the same as formerly" and "no longer as it was"?

"Not the same as formerly" implies a general difference, while "no longer as it was" specifically highlights the cessation of a past condition. The choice depends on the specific aspect you want to emphasize.