not significantly evolved

USAGE SUMMARY

"not significantly evolved" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it when discussing something that has not changed or developed in a meaningful way over time. For example: "The species has remained not significantly evolved despite environmental changes." Alternative expressions include "not greatly changed" and "not markedly developed."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

In contrast with serological and molecular assessment, morpho-histological evaluation of antibody-mediated rejection lesions has not significantly evolved.

Kidney International

The technology of the hardware used in deep brain stimulation (DBS), and the mode of delivering the stimulation have not significantly evolved since the start of the modern era of DBS 25 years ago.

Parkinsonism & Related Disorders

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Demographic shifts in the United States have increased the number of people with chronic illnesses; however, the nation's healthcare delivery system has not significantly evolved to meet the changing needs of its population.

Duke University

These tendencies are reinforced by cultural traits that have not significantly evolved since I arrived in Shanghai in 1998.

Huffington Post

But now the merging of external and internal threats is greater than ever, requiring the restructuring of security forces that have not significantly evolved since the revolution.

Los Angeles Times

We also found similar survival outcomes for patients transplanted before 2006 compared to the ELN not assigned patients transplanted after 2006, which suggests that the referral patterns for NK-AML without diagnostic molecular testing have not significantly evolved over the past decade.

Bone Marrow Transplantation

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

Published studies have also shown that EBOV is not significantly evolving, despite undergoing extensive passaging in humans during the 2014 15 outbreaks (Hoenen et al., 2015) (Tong et al., 2015).

Protein & Cell

Much of today's thinking hasn't significantly evolved from the work that focused on building propensity models 15 years ago.

HuffPost

Our common and traditional approach to leadership hasn't significantly evolved since the dawn of the industrial age.

HuffPost

Third, this core white matter DTI signature does not seem to significantly evolve, in keeping with the novel observation that individual clinical upper motor neuron scores show rather limited variability as disability proceeds.

Brain

The tools, however, have significantly evolved.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "not significantly evolved", ensure that you're comparing it to a specific point in time or a previous state to provide context for the lack of change.

Common error

Avoid using "not significantly evolved" when there have been clear and measurable changes, even if they don't meet a subjective threshold for 'significant'. Instead, quantify the changes to maintain accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not significantly evolved" functions as an adverbial modifier describing the extent to which something has changed. It indicates that the subject in question has undergone minimal or inconsequential development. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and is found in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

42%

News & Media

33%

Academia

17%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "not significantly evolved" is a grammatically sound phrase used to describe a lack of substantial change or development over time. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and its presence in diverse sources, particularly within science, news, and academic fields. While not exceptionally common, its usage is clear and precise, serving to highlight stability or stagnation. When employing this phrase, ensure contextual clarity and avoid overstating the absence of change. Alternative phrases like "largely unchanged" or "remained fundamentally the same" can offer subtle variations in meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

largely unchanged

Focuses on the lack of alteration.

relatively static

Emphasizes the stability and lack of movement or progress.

remained fundamentally the same

Highlights the preservation of core characteristics.

hasn't changed much

An informal way of saying little to no change has occurred.

minimally developed

Stresses the slight degree of development or advancement.

substantially unaltered

Highlights the absence of significant modifications.

basically the same

Simplifies the idea to a fundamental level of sameness.

undergone little alteration

Focuses on the limited amount of change experienced.

not greatly modified

Emphasizes the limited extent of modifications.

largely unaffected

Highlights the lack of impact or influence causing change.

FAQs

What does "not significantly evolved" mean?

It means that something has not changed or developed to a considerable extent over a period of time. The phrase suggests that any changes have been minimal or inconsequential.

How can I use "not significantly evolved" in a sentence?

You can use it to describe a technology, concept, or species that has retained its core characteristics over time. For instance: "Despite advancements in other fields, this technology has "not significantly evolved" since its inception".

What are some alternatives to "not significantly evolved"?

Alternatives include "largely unchanged", "relatively static", or "remained fundamentally the same". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you wish to convey.

Is it better to say "not significantly evolved" or "slightly evolved"?

It depends on the degree of change. "Not significantly evolved" implies minimal change, while "slightly evolved" suggests some change, although not substantial. Choose the phrase that most accurately reflects the extent of the evolution.