not seamless

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not seamless" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it to describe something that is not smooth, continuous, or without interruptions. For example, "The transition between the two scenes was not seamless." Alternative expressions include "not smooth" and "not fluid."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

46 human-written examples

More than ever, a good rule of thumb is, "If it is not seamless, it is not secure". But it is increasingly difficult to create that seamlessness with a reactive approach that is more tactical than strategic.

Forbes

The transition was not seamless.

The New Yorker

But right now it's not seamless.

The New York Times

And yet they're not seamless.

The Guardian

Still, the services are not seamless.

The New York Times

The performances are purposefully not seamless.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

14 human-written examples

The Teabagger narrative is not seamless--we only make it so by running for the hills.

Huffington Post

"Flights aren't as frequent, connections aren't seamless.

The New York Times

(Recent desserts at Jean Georges suggested that the changeover isn't seamless there, either).

The New York Times - Food

Yet Man Ray's break with the past wasn't seamless.

The New York Times - Arts

Born into a family of atheists, she converted to Catholicism at 21. Her journey into faith wasn't seamless.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing processes or transitions, use "not seamless" to clearly indicate a lack of smoothness or integration. This emphasizes areas needing improvement or further attention.

Common error

While "not seamless" is generally acceptable, avoid overuse in highly formal or technical writing. Opt for more precise language that specifies the exact nature of the problem, such as "lacking integration" or "experiencing compatibility issues."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not seamless" functions as an adjective phrase, typically modifying a noun to indicate a lack of smoothness, continuity, or perfect integration. Ludwig examples show it describing transitions, services, and processes.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

56%

Academia

22%

Science

13%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "not seamless" effectively conveys a lack of smoothness, continuity, or perfect integration. As highlighted by Ludwig, it commonly describes transitions, services, and processes needing improvement, particularly in News & Media, Academia and Science contexts. While grammatically correct and frequently used, particularly as shown by Ludwig, being mindful of overly formal contexts is essential. Alternative phrases like "not smooth", "not fluid", and "not integrated" offer nuanced options depending on the desired emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not smooth

Focuses on the lack of a polished or even quality.

not continuous

Emphasizes the lack of uninterrupted flow or connection.

not fluid

Highlights the absence of effortless movement or transition.

not integrated

Stresses the separation or lack of unified function between elements.

not connected

Indicates a lack of association or link between components.

not unified

Emphasizes the absence of a single, cohesive whole.

not cohesive

Highlights the lack of unity or consistency in a group or system.

not consistent

Implies a lack of uniformity or predictability.

disjointed

Suggests a lack of coherence or connection between parts.

fragmented

Focuses on the state of being broken into separate, disconnected pieces.

FAQs

How can I use "not seamless" in a sentence?

You can use "not seamless" to describe any process, transition, or system that lacks smoothness or integration. For example, "The transition between departments was "not seamless", leading to confusion and delays".

What are some alternatives to "not seamless"?

Alternatives include "not smooth", "not fluid", "not integrated", or "disjointed". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to say "not seamless" or "not perfectly seamless"?

While "not perfectly seamless" adds emphasis, it can sometimes sound redundant. "Not seamless" is usually sufficient to convey the intended meaning. Consider the context to determine if the extra emphasis is necessary.

What does it mean when something is described as "not seamless"?

It means that the thing being described lacks a smooth transition, integration, or flow. There are noticeable interruptions, gaps, or inconsistencies.