not restricted to

USAGE SUMMARY

"not restricted to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something is not limited to a certain set of things or situations. For example, "This policy applies to all employees, not restricted to management."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Developments are not restricted to bus lines.

The New York Times

The phenomenon is not restricted to Americans.

The New York Times

The strategy was not restricted to credit.

The Economist

Such stories were not restricted to baseball.

The New York Times - Sports

Mesopredator release is not restricted to North America.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The problem is not restricted to fathers.

The New York Times

This is not restricted to West Africa.

The Guardian - Opinion

It is not restricted to whites only".

The Guardian

The conversation was not restricted to science.

The Guardian

Its use is not restricted to sportsmen.

The Telegraph

This privilege is not restricted to suspects.

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "not restricted to", ensure the context makes it clear what the restriction might have been. This provides clarity and prevents ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid assuming that readers will automatically understand the full range of possibilities beyond what is explicitly mentioned after using "not restricted to". Providing examples can enhance clarity and avoid misinterpretations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not restricted to" functions as a qualifier, indicating that something is not limited to a specific set or category. It broadens the scope of inclusion, as confirmed by Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

59%

Science

24%

Encyclopedias

3%

Less common in

Academia

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "not restricted to" is a versatile phrase used to indicate that something is not limited to a specific set of items or conditions. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely used across various contexts. While it is most commonly found in news and media, its usage extends to scientific and academic writing. When employing this phrase, ensure that the broader context is clear to prevent any ambiguity. Consider alternatives such as ""not limited to"" or ""not exclusive to"" to fine-tune your message. By following these guidelines, you can effectively use "not restricted to" to enhance clarity and avoid misunderstandings in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not limited to

A direct synonym, focusing on the absence of limitations.

not confined to

Implies a boundary or enclosure that is not present.

not exclusive to

Highlights that something is also available to others or applicable in other situations.

not solely for

Emphasizes that something is not only intended for a specific purpose or group.

not uniquely for

Indicates that something is not unique to a particular entity or case.

applicable beyond

Suggests that something has relevance or use in contexts beyond a specific one.

extends beyond

Indicates that something's scope or influence reaches further than a certain point.

not just for

Similar to "not solely for", but with a slightly more informal tone.

encompasses more than

Indicates that something includes or covers a wider range than initially specified.

is broader than

Highlights the wider scope or range of something.

FAQs

How can I use "not restricted to" in a sentence?

Use "not restricted to" to indicate that a category or list is not exhaustive. For example, "The competition is "not restricted to" professional athletes; amateurs are also welcome."

What phrases are similar to "not restricted to"?

Similar phrases include "not limited to", "not confined to", and "not exclusive to". The best choice depends on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "not limited to" or "not restricted to"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct and have similar meanings. "Not restricted to" may imply a stronger sense of potential constraint, while ""not limited to"" simply suggests an absence of boundaries. Choose the phrase that best fits the context.

Can "not restricted to" be used in formal writing?

Yes, "not restricted to" is suitable for formal writing. It is a clear and professional way to indicate that a category or list is non-exhaustive. However, consider whether a more specific alternative, such as "includes but is not limited to", might be more appropriate in certain contexts.