not recognised

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not recognised" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has not been acknowledged or accepted, often in contexts related to identity, status, or validity. Example: "The new policy was not recognised by the governing body, leading to confusion among the members."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That's not recognised by him.

Independent

Probationary periods are not recognised.

The Economist

"PIN not recognised".

The Guardian - Tech

Moreover, their academic degrees are not recognised.

The Economist

Trade unions are not recognised".

The Guardian

Other skills and aptitudes were not recognised.

The Guardian

Rape within marriage is not recognised.

The Guardian

"I'm not recognised that much," Doyle insists.

The Guardian - Books

However, his Colombia caps are not recognised by Fifa.

The Guardian - Sport

"But I feel that my contribution is not recognised.

The Guardian

But Mubarak is not recognised as a refugee in Israel.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "not recognised", ensure the context clearly indicates what is lacking recognition. Specify who or what is doing the recognising, and what the object of recognition is.

Common error

Avoid using "not recognised" excessively in passive constructions, as it can make your writing sound weak. Instead, consider rephrasing to emphasize the actor who fails to recognise, creating a more direct and impactful statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not recognised" functions as a modifier, typically used within a predicate to describe a subject's state of being unacknowledged, unaccepted, or unidentified. As evidenced by Ludwig, it often appears after verbs like "is", "was", or "are" to indicate a passive condition.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Science

31%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "not recognised" is a versatile expression used to denote a lack of acknowledgement, acceptance, or identification. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's grammatically correct and commonly found across various domains, including News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business contexts. When using "not recognised", clarity is key. Make sure the context clearly defines who or what is failing to recognise something. Common alternatives include "unrecognized", "not acknowledged" and "not identified". Avoid overuse in passive constructions to maintain strong, direct writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

unrecognized

This alternative is a single word, often used interchangeably with "not recognised" to denote a lack of recognition.

not acknowledged

This phrase replaces "recognised" with "acknowledged", emphasizing a lack of formal acceptance or awareness.

not identified

This alternative highlights a failure to pinpoint or categorize something or someone.

not validated

This option emphasizes the absence of official confirmation or endorsement.

not approved

This alternative signifies a lack of official permission or agreement.

not accepted

This phrase focuses on a refusal to embrace or consider something valid.

overlooked

This single word implies something was missed or not given due attention.

ignored

This alternative suggests a deliberate choice to disregard something.

not appreciated

This phrase indicates a lack of value or gratitude being shown.

disregarded

This alternative indicates that something has been dismissed as unimportant.

FAQs

How can I use "not recognised" in a sentence?

You can use "not recognised" to indicate a lack of acknowledgement or acceptance. For example, "The importance of preventative measures was "not recognised" until the outbreak occurred."

What are some alternatives to "not recognised"?

Alternatives include "unrecognized", "not acknowledged", or "not identified". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it "not recognised" or "unrecognised"?

Both "not recognised" and "unrecognized" are valid. "Not recognised" is a two-word phrase, while "unrecognized" is a single word. The choice depends on stylistic preference.

What's the difference between "not recognised" and "not accepted"?

"Not recognised" implies a lack of awareness or acknowledgement, while "not accepted" suggests a conscious decision to reject or disapprove. For example, a counterfeit bill might be "not recognised" by a machine, while a proposal might be "not accepted" by a committee.