Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
not practical for us
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "not practical for us" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing a situation, plan, or idea that is not feasible or suitable for a particular group or context. Example: "While the proposal has its merits, it is ultimately not practical for us given our current resources."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
3 human-written examples
"It's not practical for us as a little office to do a global analysis and draw up an accredited list.
News & Media
Because it is not practical for us to determine which products are capable of export to Syria from those that are not, we have blocked all exports of products to Syria".
News & Media
Thirdly, some of the examined networks had already excluded specific trials and treatments upfront, and it was not practical for us to try to retrieve the excluded trials and evaluate the impact of their inclusion.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
While informative for robust octopuses, most tracking methods are not practical for use with small or delicate species [5].
Science
Therefore, we preferred using cardio-STIC, though it is currently not practical for widely use.
Science
Chronic calorie restriction is not practical for clinical use since it causes unacceptable weight loss in cancer patients [ 9].
Science
However, its use is costly and not practical for large-scale use in the industry.
This approach, however, is computationally intensive and hence is in practice not practical for analysis of large numbers of markers.
Science
In a few words, it is not practical for every day design use.
The standard CFD assays are work-intensive and not practical for routine clinical laboratory use.
Science
Not practical for self defense, but useful for camping and outdoor recreation.
Wiki
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "not practical for us", clearly state the reason why it is not practical, to provide context and avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "not practical for us" as a blanket statement. Instead, provide specific reasons or examples to support your assertion and enhance your argument.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "not practical for us" functions as an adjective phrase that modifies an implied noun (e.g., a plan, a method, an idea). It expresses a judgment about the feasibility or suitability of something for a specific group. According to Ludwig, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
News & Media
66%
Science
33%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "not practical for us" is a grammatically sound and usable phrase, albeit relatively rare in occurrence. As Ludwig AI suggests, it indicates that something is unfeasible or inappropriate for a specific group due to limitations or circumstances. The phrase is used in neutral contexts, mainly in news and media and science, to convey a reason for rejection or an explanation of why a certain action cannot be undertaken. For increased clarity and impact, provide supporting reasons when employing the phrase.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
unrealistic for us
Replaces 'practical' with 'realistic', emphasizing a lack of attainability.
infeasible for our purposes
Substitutes 'practical' with 'feasible' and specifies 'our purposes' for clarity.
not viable for us
Uses 'viable' instead of 'practical', highlighting a lack of sustainability or workability.
not suitable for us
Replaces 'practical' with 'suitable', focusing on appropriateness.
not workable for us
Emphasizes that the method or solution cannot be implemented.
beyond our capabilities
Highlights a limitation in ability rather than just practicality.
not achievable for us
Focuses on the impossibility of reaching a certain outcome.
not advisable for us
Suggests that while possible, it's not recommended.
untenable for us
Implies that the situation or option is unsustainable or indefensible.
not advantageous for us
Highlights a lack of benefit rather than mere impracticality.
FAQs
What does "not practical for us" mean?
It means something is not feasible or suitable for a particular group due to limitations or circumstances. You could use alternative phrases like "not viable for us" or "not suitable for us".
How can I use "not practical for us" in a sentence?
You can use it to explain why a plan, idea, or solution won't work for a specific group. For example, "While the new software is innovative, it's "not practical for us" because our current hardware can't support it."
Which is correct, "not practical for us" or "unpractical for us"?
"Not practical for us" is the correct and more common phrasing. "Unpractical" is less frequently used. Using "not practical for us" is generally preferred.
What's the difference between "not practical for us" and "not feasible for us"?
While similar, "not practical for us" often implies difficulties in implementation or everyday use, whereas "not feasible for us" often suggests fundamental limitations or impossibility. The nuance depends on the context.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested