not necessary to include

USAGE SUMMARY

'not necessary to include' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it anytime you want to emphasize that something is unnecessary to include or to emphasize that something should not be included. For example, you could say, "This information is not necessary to include in the report."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

34 human-written examples

It is not necessary to include a departmental code.

Yale University

It is not necessary to include all six of these courses in your plan of study, but here are some points to bear in mind.

Harvard University

When a web address contains "www," it is not necessary to include the "http://." You may also omit the "www" (optional).

University of California, Berkeley

Sometimes multiple iterations of this process can reveal that an additional experiment should be included or that certain results are not necessary to include in the main text.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

These days, copyright protection applies automatically, and it is not necessary to include a copyright notice on one's work or register the work with the U.S. Copyright Office to receive protection.

University of California, Berkeley

It is not necessary to include "AND" between search terms.

University of Chicago

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

26 human-written examples

In this London novel, which alternates purposefully between the still air of the National Gallery and the chaotic streets of Camden market, it probably wasn't necessary to include a weekend break at a B&B next to an asylum in an unsavoury cathedral town.

The Guardian - Books

Because the MCAS was designed to operate only in extreme conditions that pilots should only rarely experience, a decision was made that it wasn't necessary to include a reference to the system, said the people, who asked not to be named because they weren't authorized to speak about the issue.

Los Angeles Times

It isn't necessary to include a straightforward message, so don't force it––if you do, your lesson may come off as heavy-handed, which won't be appealing to kids.

WikiHow

Since significant phase difference was not observed between the measured voltage drop and the applied current, it does not appear necessary to include reactance (capacitance or inductance) in modeling of cerebral cortical tissues.

Brain Topography

Hence self-deprecating humour or remark, not "self-depreciating" derby as in Everton v Liverpool or Newbury FC v Thatcham Town; it is not normally necessary to include the word "local" de rigueur the two Us are de rigueur derisive or derisory?

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "not necessary to include," consider whether a more concise alternative like "optional" or "can be omitted" might be more effective, especially in technical writing.

Common error

While grammatically correct, using "not necessary to include" in very informal settings can sound overly formal or stilted. Opt for simpler alternatives like "don't need to add" or "can skip" in casual conversation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not necessary to include" functions as an adjective phrase that modifies a noun or pronoun, indicating that the inclusion of something is optional or not required. Ludwig provides numerous examples across various domains that show how the phrase is used to convey this sense of optionality or redundancy.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

38%

Academia

24%

News & Media

19%

Less common in

Wiki

11%

Formal & Business

4%

Reference

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "not necessary to include" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to indicate that something is optional or redundant. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage is correct and suitable for various contexts. While versatile, consider more concise alternatives like "optional" in less formal settings. The phrase is frequently found in scientific, academic, and news-related sources, highlighting its utility in formal communication. Be mindful of the context and audience to ensure the most effective delivery of your message.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

unnecessary to include

A more direct way of expressing that inclusion is not needed.

not required to include

Replaces "necessary" with "required" for a slightly more formal tone.

not essential to include

Substitutes "necessary" with "essential", emphasizing the non-critical nature of the inclusion.

not mandatory to include

Replaces "necessary" with "mandatory", highlighting that inclusion is not compulsory.

need not be included

A slightly more formal phrasing indicating that something does not have to be included.

can be omitted

A more concise way of saying that something "is not necessary to include", focusing on the act of omission.

is optional

Simplifies the phrase to indicate that inclusion is a choice.

is not a requirement

Rephrases the idea to focus on the lack of a formal requirement.

inclusion is not needed

Shifts the emphasis to the lack of need for inclusion.

is dispensable

Indicates that something can be easily done without, implying it's "not necessary to include".

FAQs

What does "not necessary to include" mean?

The phrase "not necessary to include" means that something is optional and can be left out without affecting the overall meaning or completeness. It implies that including the item is not a requirement.

How can I use "not necessary to include" in a sentence?

You can use "not necessary to include" to indicate that a piece of information or an item is optional. For example: "It is "not necessary to include" your address on the application."

What are some alternatives to "not necessary to include"?

Some alternatives to "not necessary to include" are "optional", "can be omitted", "not required", or "unnecessary". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it "not necessary to include" or "not necessary including"?

"Not necessary to include" is the correct and grammatically sound phrase. "Not necessary including" is not a standard construction and should be avoided.