not mutually exclusive

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not mutually exclusive" is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to describe two or more items that can exist together as opposed to one replacing the other. For example: "Shopping at a local store and online can both be beneficial; they are not mutually exclusive."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It's not mutually exclusive".

Independent

They're not mutually exclusive.

The New York Times

"They are not mutually exclusive".

The Guardian

They were not mutually exclusive.

The New York Times

But the two are not mutually exclusive.

The New York Times

Yet these views are not mutually exclusive.

The New York Times

But these are not mutually exclusive.

Independent

Those two things are not mutually exclusive.

The New Yorker

Comprehension and censure are not mutually exclusive.

The New York Times

Liberty and security are not mutually exclusive.

The New York Times

The two explanations are not mutually exclusive.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "not mutually exclusive" to clearly indicate that two or more options or ideas can coexist or overlap, rather than being in opposition. This is particularly useful in nuanced discussions or when addressing potential misunderstandings.

Common error

Avoid using "not mutually exclusive" when you actually mean 'mutually inclusive'. "Not mutually exclusive" means that the items can coexist, but don't have to. 'Mutually inclusive' implies that they must coexist or overlap.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not mutually exclusive" serves as a qualifier, indicating that two or more concepts, options, or categories can coexist or overlap. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in various contexts, demonstrated through numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

32%

Science

31%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "not mutually exclusive" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to indicate that two or more options or ideas can coexist, rather than being in opposition. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is employed across various contexts, including news, science, business, and general writing. Its function is to clarify relationships, prevent assumptions of incompatibility, and promote inclusive understanding. While predominantly neutral to formal in register, it's essential to avoid confusing it with 'mutually inclusive'. Understanding its nuances and practical applications will enhance clarity and precision in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

compatible

This alternative is a shorter, more direct way to convey that two things can exist together.

not incompatible

This alternative uses a double negative for emphasis, suggesting that the two things do not contradict each other.

can coexist

This alternative highlights the ability of two things to exist at the same time.

not contradictory

This alternative focuses on the absence of conflict between two things.

not conflicting

Similar to 'not contradictory', this suggests that the two things do not clash.

harmonious

Implies a positive and agreeable relationship between the elements.

synergistic

Suggests that the combination of two things creates a greater effect than the sum of their individual effects.

complementary

Highlights that two things enhance each other.

interrelated

Indicates a connection or relationship between two things.

interdependent

Highlights that two things rely on each other.

FAQs

How can I use "not mutually exclusive" in a sentence?

You can use "not mutually exclusive" to indicate that two or more options or ideas can coexist. For example: "Focusing on long-term goals and addressing immediate needs are "not mutually exclusive"".

What's the difference between "not mutually exclusive" and "mutually inclusive"?

"Not mutually exclusive" means that two things can coexist but don't necessarily have to. "Mutually inclusive", on the other hand, means that they must coexist or overlap. They have opposite meanings.

Which is correct, "not mutually exclusive" or "mutually exclusive"?

Both phrases are correct, but they have opposite meanings. "Not mutually exclusive" means things can coexist, while "mutually exclusive" means they cannot.

What are some alternatives to "not mutually exclusive"?

You can use alternatives like "compatible", "can coexist", or "not contradictory" depending on the context.