not include

USAGE SUMMARY

"not include" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that is not part of a group or collection. For example, "This package does not include any snacks."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

The fee, $20, does not include refreshments.

The New York Times - Arts

Prices do not include tax and tip.

The New York Times - Food

That decision did not include rare earths.

The New York Times

Carter's pardon did not include deserters.

The New Yorker

Prices do not include taxes.

The New York Times

Prices do not include airfare.

The New York Times - Travel

They did not include prayers.

The New York Times

That does not include antidepressants.

The New York Times

Prices do not include transport.

The Guardian

Rates do not include tax.

The New York Times

They did not include meteors.

The New York Times - Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider synonyms like "exclude" or "omit" for a more concise expression, especially in formal writing.

Common error

Avoid assuming the reader understands what "not include" refers to. Always specify the scope of what is being excluded to prevent misinterpretations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not include" functions as a predicate in a sentence, specifically indicating what is excluded or absent from a particular set or category. Ludwig AI validates its common usage across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Wiki

22%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "not include" is a versatile and frequently used expression for indicating exclusion or absence. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread application across diverse contexts, including news, science, and general writing. When using "not include", clarity is key; ensure the scope of exclusion is well-defined to prevent ambiguity. Consider using synonyms like "exclude" or "omit" for a more concise expression in formal settings. Remember, while "doesn't include" is acceptable, "does not include" maintains a more formal tone.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

exclude

This is a more concise and direct synonym.

omit

This suggests a deliberate act of leaving something out.

leave out

This is a more informal way of saying "not include".

does not cover

This is used when referring to the scope of something.

is not comprised of

This specifies the components of something.

lack

This implies a deficiency or absence of something.

without

This indicates the absence of something as a condition.

not feature

This suggests something is absent as a characteristic.

disregard

This implies ignoring or overlooking something.

bypass

This suggests intentionally avoiding something.

FAQs

How can I use "not include" in a sentence?

You can use "not include" to specify what is being left out of a group or list. For instance, "The price does "not include" taxes."

What are some alternatives to "not include"?

Alternatives include "exclude", "omit", or "leave out" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "does not include" or "doesn't include"?

Both "does not include" and "doesn't include" are correct. "Doesn't include" is a contraction and is more informal, while "does not include" is more formal.

What's the difference between "not include" and "exclude"?

"Not include" is a general way to state that something is not part of a group. "Exclude" often implies a deliberate decision to keep something out.