Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
not good for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "not good for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to express that something is not beneficial or appropriate for a situation. Example: "Eating a full meal before bedtime is not good for digestion."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Not good for China.
News & Media
It's not good for families.
News & Media
They're not good for you".
News & Media
That's not good for anyone".
News & Media
It's not good for seniors.
News & Media
It's not good for anyone".
News & Media
It's not good for us.
News & Media
It's not good for America".
News & Media
"That's not good for us.
News & Media
It's not good for cinema.
News & Media
Not good for digestion.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "not good for", ensure the context clearly specifies what the subject is detrimental to. Vague usage can weaken the impact of your statement.
Common error
In formal writing, relying too heavily on "not good for" can sound simplistic. Enhance your writing by using stronger, more specific synonyms like "detrimental", "unfavorable", or "counterproductive" to convey the negative impact more precisely.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "not good for" primarily functions as a predicate adjective modifying a noun or pronoun. It expresses that something has negative consequences or is detrimental to the subject. Ludwig's examples demonstrate this function across diverse contexts.
Frequent in
News & Media
47%
Wiki
25%
Formal & Business
9%
Less common in
Science
12%
Social Media
3%
Reference
4%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "not good for" is a versatile and commonly used expression to indicate that something is unfavorable or detrimental. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and broad applicability across various contexts. While its frequency is high, particularly in news and media and wiki sources, writers should consider using more formal alternatives like "detrimental" or "unfavorable" in academic or business writing to achieve a more sophisticated tone. Ultimately, understanding the nuance and context will ensure effective communication.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
bad for
A more informal and direct synonym.
detrimental to
Focuses on the damaging or harmful aspect.
harmful to
Emphasizes the potential for causing damage.
unfavorable to
Indicates a lack of support or positive outcome.
unsuitable for
Similar to inappropriate, but can also imply inadequacy.
inappropriate for
Suggests something is unsuitable or not fitting.
undesirable for
Highlights the unwanted or unwelcome nature of something.
counterproductive to
Indicates an action that hinders progress.
adverse to
Implies an opposing or conflicting effect.
prejudicial to
Highlights the potential for bias or unfairness.
FAQs
How can I use "not good for" in a sentence?
You can use "not good for" to express that something is detrimental or unfavorable to someone or something. For example, "Smoking is "bad for" your health" or "That policy is "unfavorable to" small businesses".
What are some alternatives to saying "not good for"?
Alternatives include "detrimental to", "harmful to", "unsuitable for", and "inappropriate for", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it always appropriate to use "not good for" in formal writing?
While grammatically correct, "not good for" may sound too informal in some formal contexts. Consider using more sophisticated alternatives like "adverse to" or "prejudicial to" for a more polished tone.
What's the difference between "not good for" and "bad for"?
"Not good for" and "bad for" are often interchangeable, but "not good for" can sometimes imply a milder negative effect. "Bad for" tends to be more direct and straightforward.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested