Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

harmful to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"harmful to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to something that is detrimental, dangerous, or detrimental to someone or something else. For example: The chemicals in the paint are harmful to the environment.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Harmful to youth?

News & Media

The New York Times

"This fishing method is harmful to dolphins".

News & Media

The New York Times

"It's been harmful to the state".

News & Media

The New York Times

She's not harmful to anybody".

News & Media

The New York Times

It's harmful to both sides".

News & Media

The New York Times

"$4 gasoline is harmful to the economy, harmful to business and harmful to all of us personally.

News & Media

The Guardian

It might be harmful to us.

News & Media

The New York Times

"It's just harmful to our troops".

News & Media

The New York Times

It was particularly harmful to my reputation".

News & Media

The New York Times

They are not considered harmful to humans.

News & Media

The New York Times

Are "thematic elements" harmful to children?

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "harmful to", ensure you clearly specify what is being harmed. This adds clarity and impact to your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "harmful to" in overly casual conversations. Simpler alternatives like "bad for" might be more appropriate.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "harmful to" functions as an adjective phrase, modifying a noun by describing its negative impact or potential for causing damage. Ludwig examples show its wide usage in describing potentially damaging factors.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Wiki

20%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "harmful to" is a grammatically correct and versatile expression used to describe something that causes damage or has negative consequences. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for various contexts, though simpler alternatives may be preferred in informal settings. It appears very frequently in "News & Media", "Wiki", and "Science" contexts, as derived from Ludwig's analysis of numerous examples. When using "harmful to", be specific about what's being harmed for clarity and impact. While "harmful for" exists, "harmful to" is generally considered more correct. Knowing its best use scenarios can vastly improve ones writing.

FAQs

How can I use "harmful to" in a sentence?

Use "harmful to" to describe something that causes damage or has a negative impact. For instance, "Smoking is "harmful to" your health."

What are some alternatives to "harmful to"?

Alternatives include "detrimental to", "injurious to", and "damaging to". The best choice depends on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "harmful for" instead of "harmful to"?

While "harmful for" is sometimes used, ""harmful to"" is generally considered more grammatically correct and widely accepted, especially in formal writing.

What's the difference between "harmful to" and "dangerous to"?

"Dangerous to" implies an immediate or obvious threat, while ""harmful to"" suggests a more gradual or subtle negative effect. For example, a venomous snake is "dangerous to" humans, while prolonged exposure to pollution is ""harmful to"" their health.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: