Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
harmful to
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"harmful to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to something that is detrimental, dangerous, or detrimental to someone or something else. For example: The chemicals in the paint are harmful to the environment.
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Wiki
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Harmful to youth?
News & Media
"This fishing method is harmful to dolphins".
News & Media
"It's been harmful to the state".
News & Media
She's not harmful to anybody".
News & Media
It's harmful to both sides".
News & Media
"$4 gasoline is harmful to the economy, harmful to business and harmful to all of us personally.
News & Media
It might be harmful to us.
News & Media
"It's just harmful to our troops".
News & Media
It was particularly harmful to my reputation".
News & Media
They are not considered harmful to humans.
News & Media
Are "thematic elements" harmful to children?
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "harmful to", ensure you clearly specify what is being harmed. This adds clarity and impact to your statement.
Common error
Avoid using "harmful to" in overly casual conversations. Simpler alternatives like "bad for" might be more appropriate.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "harmful to" functions as an adjective phrase, modifying a noun by describing its negative impact or potential for causing damage. Ludwig examples show its wide usage in describing potentially damaging factors.
Frequent in
News & Media
45%
Wiki
20%
Science
15%
Less common in
Formal & Business
10%
Encyclopedias
5%
Reference
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "harmful to" is a grammatically correct and versatile expression used to describe something that causes damage or has negative consequences. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for various contexts, though simpler alternatives may be preferred in informal settings. It appears very frequently in "News & Media", "Wiki", and "Science" contexts, as derived from Ludwig's analysis of numerous examples. When using "harmful to", be specific about what's being harmed for clarity and impact. While "harmful for" exists, "harmful to" is generally considered more correct. Knowing its best use scenarios can vastly improve ones writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
damaging to
Focuses on the act of causing damage or harm.
detrimental to
More formal and emphasizes the long-term negative consequences.
hazardous to
Implies a risk or danger.
injurious to
Suggests physical harm or damage.
unhealthy for
Specifically relates to health and well-being.
prejudicial to
Indicates bias or unfairness leading to harm.
toxic to
Suggests a poisonous or severely damaging effect.
unfavorable to
Indicates a negative or disadvantageous impact.
adverse to
A formal alternative, signifying opposition or antagonism resulting in harm.
negative impact on
More general, referring to any adverse effect.
FAQs
How can I use "harmful to" in a sentence?
Use "harmful to" to describe something that causes damage or has a negative impact. For instance, "Smoking is "harmful to" your health."
What are some alternatives to "harmful to"?
Alternatives include "detrimental to", "injurious to", and "damaging to". The best choice depends on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.
Is it correct to say "harmful for" instead of "harmful to"?
While "harmful for" is sometimes used, ""harmful to"" is generally considered more grammatically correct and widely accepted, especially in formal writing.
What's the difference between "harmful to" and "dangerous to"?
"Dangerous to" implies an immediate or obvious threat, while ""harmful to"" suggests a more gradual or subtle negative effect. For example, a venomous snake is "dangerous to" humans, while prolonged exposure to pollution is ""harmful to"" their health.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested