Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

not excluded

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"not excluded" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that someone or something is not left out of a particular category. For example: "The annual season pass includes access to all the theme park's attractions, not excluded."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Not excluded.

Grandmasters were not excluded.

News & Media

The New York Times

Mr. Cayne is not excluded.

News & Media

The New York Times

A catastrophic loss of equilibrium stability is then not excluded.

Safety equipment protecting PHMSA-regulated pipeline segments is not excluded.

But he said the possibility "is not excluded".

News & Media

The Guardian

Another diplomat said "a plenary tonight is still not excluded".

News & Media

The Guardian

But the US has not excluded raids on other countries.

News & Media

The Guardian

But the operators' computers are not excluded from the process.

News & Media

The New York Times

Spoilt, neglected, ailing, or overdressed babies are not excluded.

News & Media

The Guardian

Human creativity was not excluded but was explained away.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "not excluded" when you want to emphasize that something is specifically included or considered, even when it might have been assumed otherwise. This can clarify potential ambiguities.

Common error

While "not excluded" is grammatically correct, overuse of passive voice can make your writing sound weak. Consider rephrasing to use active voice where appropriate for a more direct and engaging style. For example, instead of "Those items were not excluded", try "We included those items".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not excluded" functions primarily as a negating adjective phrase. It modifies a noun or pronoun to indicate that it is not left out or omitted from a particular group or consideration. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

35%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

10%

Reference

8%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "not excluded" is grammatically correct and widely used to emphasize that something or someone is included within a particular group or consideration. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, its primary function is to provide assurance or clarification, removing potential doubts about inclusion. While it appears across various registers, it is most common in news, science, and academic contexts. To enhance writing, consider using active voice where possible and varying phrasing to avoid overuse. Related phrases like "not precluded" and "still under consideration" can offer alternative expressions depending on the desired nuance.

FAQs

How can I use "not excluded" in a sentence?

Use "not excluded" to clarify that something or someone is included or considered, rather than being left out. For example, "All applicants meeting the basic requirements are "not excluded" from the next round of interviews".

What are some alternatives to the phrase "not excluded"?

You can use phrases such as "not omitted", "not precluded", or "still under consideration" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "included" instead of "not excluded"?

It depends on the nuance you want to convey. "Included" is a direct affirmation of inclusion. "Not excluded" implies that there might have been an assumption or possibility of exclusion, making it a more defensive or clarifying statement. For instance, "All costs are included" is a simpler statement. However, "No fees are "not excluded"" emphasizes transparency and counters potential concerns about hidden costs.

When should I use "not excluded" instead of "included"?

Use "not excluded" when there's a potential or perceived risk of something being left out, or when you want to reassure the audience that something is indeed part of a set. For example, "Even pre-existing conditions are "not excluded" from coverage" is more reassuring than "Pre-existing conditions are included in coverage".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: