Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
not excluded
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"not excluded" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that someone or something is not left out of a particular category. For example: "The annual season pass includes access to all the theme park's attractions, not excluded."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Not excluded.
Grandmasters were not excluded.
News & Media
Mr. Cayne is not excluded.
News & Media
A catastrophic loss of equilibrium stability is then not excluded.
Safety equipment protecting PHMSA-regulated pipeline segments is not excluded.
Academia
But he said the possibility "is not excluded".
News & Media
Another diplomat said "a plenary tonight is still not excluded".
News & Media
But the US has not excluded raids on other countries.
News & Media
But the operators' computers are not excluded from the process.
News & Media
Spoilt, neglected, ailing, or overdressed babies are not excluded.
News & Media
Human creativity was not excluded but was explained away.
Encyclopedias
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "not excluded" when you want to emphasize that something is specifically included or considered, even when it might have been assumed otherwise. This can clarify potential ambiguities.
Common error
While "not excluded" is grammatically correct, overuse of passive voice can make your writing sound weak. Consider rephrasing to use active voice where appropriate for a more direct and engaging style. For example, instead of "Those items were not excluded", try "We included those items".
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "not excluded" functions primarily as a negating adjective phrase. It modifies a noun or pronoun to indicate that it is not left out or omitted from a particular group or consideration. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in various contexts.
Frequent in
News & Media
35%
Science
35%
Academia
10%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
2%
Formal & Business
10%
Reference
8%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "not excluded" is grammatically correct and widely used to emphasize that something or someone is included within a particular group or consideration. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, its primary function is to provide assurance or clarification, removing potential doubts about inclusion. While it appears across various registers, it is most common in news, science, and academic contexts. To enhance writing, consider using active voice where possible and varying phrasing to avoid overuse. Related phrases like "not precluded" and "still under consideration" can offer alternative expressions depending on the desired nuance.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
not precluded
Replaces "excluded" with "precluded", suggesting something isn't prevented from happening or being considered.
not omitted
Substitutes "excluded" with "omitted", indicating something hasn't been left out or skipped.
not exempted
Replaces "excluded" with "exempted", emphasizing that something isn't subject to a particular rule or requirement.
not excepted
Substitutes "excluded" with "excepted", conveying that something is not treated as an exception.
not restricted
Replaces "excluded" with "restricted", indicating that something's use or access isn't limited.
not disallowed
Substitutes "excluded" with "disallowed", suggesting something isn't officially prohibited.
not forbidden
Replaces "excluded" with "forbidden", indicating that something isn't prohibited by law or authority.
not banned
Substitutes "excluded" with "banned", conveying that something isn't officially prohibited.
not prohibited
Replaces "excluded" with "prohibited", indicating that something isn't formally forbidden.
still under consideration
Shifts focus from exclusion to ongoing assessment, implying a decision hasn't been made to exclude something.
FAQs
How can I use "not excluded" in a sentence?
Use "not excluded" to clarify that something or someone is included or considered, rather than being left out. For example, "All applicants meeting the basic requirements are "not excluded" from the next round of interviews".
What are some alternatives to the phrase "not excluded"?
You can use phrases such as "not omitted", "not precluded", or "still under consideration" depending on the specific context.
Is it better to say "included" instead of "not excluded"?
It depends on the nuance you want to convey. "Included" is a direct affirmation of inclusion. "Not excluded" implies that there might have been an assumption or possibility of exclusion, making it a more defensive or clarifying statement. For instance, "All costs are included" is a simpler statement. However, "No fees are "not excluded"" emphasizes transparency and counters potential concerns about hidden costs.
When should I use "not excluded" instead of "included"?
Use "not excluded" when there's a potential or perceived risk of something being left out, or when you want to reassure the audience that something is indeed part of a set. For example, "Even pre-existing conditions are "not excluded" from coverage" is more reassuring than "Pre-existing conditions are included in coverage".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested