not easy to contest

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not easy to contest" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a claim, argument, or statement that is difficult to challenge or dispute. Example: "The evidence presented in the report is compelling and not easy to contest."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

"It's not easy to pass all the barriers," he said, referring to the intentionally onerous criteria a candidate must meet to contest the presidency.

The New York Times

Although the weather is not promising, technical races, which start at lower altitudes and involve lower speeds, are typically easier to contest.

The New York Times - Sports

Not easy to do.

The New York Times - Science

Not easy to organize.

The New York Times - Arts

Not easy to find.

The New York Times

It's just not easy to do.

The New York Times - Tech

It's not easy to like Wolfsburg.

Independent

That's not easy to answer.

The New Yorker

It is not easy to live there.

Independent

Not easy to achieve.

BBC

Again, not easy to say; probably not.

SEP

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "not easy to contest", ensure the context clearly establishes what is being challenged or disputed. This phrase is most effective when emphasizing the strength or validity of a claim or argument.

Common error

Avoid using "not easy to contest" when the challenge is merely difficult but not inherently impossible. Use softer language if the challenge is simply demanding but achievable.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not easy to contest" functions as an adjective phrase modifying an implied noun (e.g., argument, claim). It describes the characteristic of something being difficult to challenge or dispute. Ludwig AI's assessment indicates the phrase is grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

30%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "not easy to contest" is a grammatically correct phrase used to describe something difficult to challenge or dispute. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a usable and understandable expression. While it is relatively rare, it is appropriate in various contexts, though more formal alternatives exist. Its purpose is to emphasize the strength of a claim or argument, and its usage is consistent across different sources. Remember to ensure the context clearly defines what is being challenged when using this phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

hard to challenge

Replaces "easy" with its direct opposite "hard", maintaining a similar structure.

difficult to dispute

Substitutes "easy" with "difficult" and "contest" with "dispute", conveying the same level of complexity.

not simple to refute

Uses "simple" instead of "easy" and "refute" instead of "contest", focusing on the act of disproving something.

tough to argue against

Employs "tough" and "argue against" to highlight the strength needed to oppose something.

a challenge to disprove

Shifts the focus to the challenging nature of disproving a statement or claim.

not readily disputable

Replaces "easy" with "readily" and uses "disputable" to emphasize the inherent difficulty.

difficult to take issue with

Emphasizes the difficulty in finding fault or disagreement with something.

not a walk in the park to contest

Uses an idiom to convey that contesting something is not an easy or carefree task.

requires significant effort to challenge

Highlights the substantial amount of effort required to successfully challenge something.

presents a formidable challenge to contest

Uses stronger language to indicate the significant difficulty involved in contesting something.

FAQs

How can I use "not easy to contest" in a sentence?

You can use "not easy to contest" to describe a claim, argument, or decision that is difficult to challenge or dispute. For instance, "The scientific evidence supporting this theory is compelling and "not easy to contest"".

What are some alternatives to "not easy to contest"?

Alternatives include "hard to challenge", "difficult to dispute", or "tough to argue against", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "not easy to contest"?

Use "not easy to contest" when you want to emphasize that something is particularly difficult to challenge due to strong evidence, logical reasoning, or authoritative support.

Is there a more formal way to express "not easy to contest"?

Yes, you could use phrases like "difficult to refute", "not readily disputable", or "presents a formidable challenge to contest" in more formal or academic contexts.