not consistent with

USAGE SUMMARY

'not consistent with' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to compare two things or ideas and show that they do not match. For example: His actions were not consistent with the company policy.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"The bruising is not consistent with that".

The New York Times

This is not consistent with all tickets.

Cornell University

This is not consistent with – with Brett.

The Washington Post

"However, this posture is not consistent with company quality goals".

The New York Times

Trivialising them is not consistent with free-market thought.

The Guardian

The approach is therefore not consistent with prior law.

Harvard University

The traditional approaches are not consistent with cost-benefit assessment.

Annals of Nuclear Energy

These simulation results are not consistent with experimental observations.

Chemical Engineering Science

"His injuries were not consistent with a fall," Storaker said.

The New York Times - Sports

It is not consistent with what Long Island is all about -- residential, small homes.

The New York Times

Ms. Lykkegaard said the illustration accompanying the toy was not consistent with Lego's ethics and values.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "not consistent with" to clearly express that something does not align with a standard, expectation, or other established element. This helps avoid ambiguity in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "not consistent with" when a stronger term like "contradicts" or "opposes" is more appropriate. The phrase implies a lack of alignment rather than direct opposition.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not consistent with" primarily functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying a noun to indicate that it does not align or agree with something else. Ludwig AI confirms that this usage is correct and appropriate in written English, as showcased in numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Science

30%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "not consistent with" is a versatile phrase used to express a lack of alignment or agreement. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely used in various contexts, particularly in news, scientific, and academic writing. When using this phrase, be mindful of the context and consider whether a stronger term might be more appropriate. Remember to avoid overuse and ensure that your writing remains clear and concise.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

incompatible with

Focuses on the impossibility of coexistence or harmonious combination.

at odds with

Suggests a state of conflict or disagreement.

conflicting with

Highlights the presence of opposing elements or ideas.

discordant with

Emphasizes a lack of harmony or agreement.

not in accordance with

Indicates a failure to comply with a standard or rule.

deviating from

Suggests a departure from an expected norm or path.

in contrast to

Highlights a notable difference or opposition.

contradictory to

Implies a direct opposition or denial of something.

irreconcilable with

Stresses the impossibility of bringing two things into agreement.

not aligned with

Indicates a lack of shared direction or purpose.

FAQs

How can I use "not consistent with" in a sentence?

You can use "not consistent with" to indicate a lack of agreement or alignment between two things. For example, "His behavior was "not consistent with" the company's code of ethics."

What are some alternatives to "not consistent with"?

Some alternatives include "incompatible with", "at odds with", or "conflicting with", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "not consistent with" or "inconsistent with"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct. "Not consistent with" is generally considered more formal and emphasizes the lack of alignment, while "inconsistent with" is slightly more direct.

What's the difference between "not consistent with" and "different from"?

"Not consistent with" implies a lack of alignment with a standard or expectation, whereas "different from" simply indicates a dissimilarity without necessarily implying a conflict or deviation from a norm.