Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
not comprehensive enough for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "not comprehensive enough for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something lacks sufficient detail or coverage for a particular purpose or audience. Example: "The report was not comprehensive enough for the stakeholders to make an informed decision."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
5 human-written examples
Economists classify farmers based on landholdings, which is not comprehensive enough for classifying complex farming systems.
Although useful, the coverage of this dataset is not comprehensive enough for kinase statistical enrichment analysis.
Science
Secondly, traditional evaluation indicators such as cure rate and survival rate are not comprehensive enough for patients with chronic diseases.
The third limitation of the study is that our GPS-based time-activity patterns were not comprehensive enough for us to explore more refined time-activity patterns.
This is one of the most important reasons why despite of considerable research efforts throughout several years (see e.g. [ 16]), results are still not comprehensive enough for a valid extension of the EM to other environmental arenas.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
54 human-written examples
However, our data, which are certainly not comprehensive enough to allow for a full revision of these problematic families but are sufficient to hint at some taxonomic inconsistencies, indicate that the family Scutoverticidae might be split up in "Scutoverticidae s.s"., so far including only species of Scutovertex and in "Scutoverticidae s.l".l
Science
They say the proposed cuts are not comprehensive enough because they do not address pensions for teachers, university employees or judges.
News & Media
In recent years, classifier ensemble has shown promising advantage over single classifier, but the study on classifier ensemble methods for FDP is still not comprehensive enough and leaves to be further explored.
The sampling for these clades is not comprehensive enough to warrant the re-examination of taxonomic terms in the present study.
Science
Although information was to be collected on carer burden, unfortunately, there was only information completed for five patient's carers and the data were not comprehensive enough to allow any summaries to be made.
Science
Secondly, the (house) foreclosure plan is not comprehensive enough.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "not comprehensive enough for", ensure that the context clearly defines what the subject is lacking in comprehensiveness for. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "not comprehensive enough for" when a simple "incomplete" or "limited" suffices. Overusing the phrase can make your writing sound verbose.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "not comprehensive enough for" functions as an adjective phrase, modifying a noun by indicating a deficiency in its completeness or scope. This is confirmed by Ludwig AI that considers the phrase correct and usable in English.
Frequent in
Science
63%
News & Media
33%
Formal & Business
4%
Less common in
Social Media
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "not comprehensive enough for" is a grammatically correct and usable way to express that something lacks the necessary completeness or detail for a specific purpose. According to Ludwig AI, its common contexts include science and news. While not incorrect, users should be mindful of potential wordiness and consider simpler alternatives when appropriate. When writing, clarify what the subject is lacking for clarity. As Ludwig's examples show, this expression carries a neutral register suitable for a wide range of contexts.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
insufficiently thorough for
Emphasizes a lack of detail or examination.
not sufficiently detailed for
Focuses on the absence of adequate specifics.
lacking adequate coverage for
Highlights the incomplete scope of something.
not extensive enough for
Points out the limited reach or breadth.
inadequate in scope for
Stresses that something doesn't cover enough ground.
not exhaustive enough for
Suggests a need for a more complete and thorough approach.
falls short of being comprehensive for
Expresses that something does not fully meet the requirements of being complete.
not wholly inclusive for
Indicates a lack of complete inclusion.
deficient in providing a full picture for
Focuses on the incomplete nature of the information presented.
not wide-ranging enough for
Highlights the limitation of its reach.
FAQs
How can I use "not comprehensive enough for" in a sentence?
Use "not comprehensive enough for" to indicate that something lacks the necessary detail or scope for a particular purpose. For example, "The initial assessment was "not comprehensive enough for" a full diagnosis".
What are some alternatives to "not comprehensive enough for"?
Alternatives include "insufficiently thorough for", "lacking adequate coverage for", or "not sufficiently detailed for", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it better to say "not comprehensive enough" or "inadequate"?
While "inadequate" can be a simpler substitute, "not comprehensive enough" specifies that the inadequacy stems from a lack of thoroughness. Choose the phrase that best reflects the specific reason for the insufficiency.
When is it appropriate to use "not comprehensive enough for" in formal writing?
It's appropriate in formal writing when you need to explicitly state that something's lack of detail or scope prevents it from serving a particular purpose. For instance, "The data collected were "not comprehensive enough for" a statistically significant conclusion".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested