not comprehensive enough

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not comprehensive enough" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe something that lacks sufficient detail or coverage in a particular context. Example: "The report was informative, but it was not comprehensive enough to address all the issues we discussed."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Some countries' surveillance systems are not comprehensive enough.

Nature

Secondly, the (house) foreclosure plan is not comprehensive enough.

Independent

However, due to the diversity of parameters of the steel staggered-truss system and the unique features of the tested model, the experimental study is not comprehensive enough.

Thin-Walled Structures

Nevertheless, existing procedures of fire risk analysis (FRA) are still not comprehensive enough to systematically evaluate the risks to topside structure safety.

Ocean Engineering

Of the existing institutions that deal with the issue, the Arctic council is prevented (by the US) from addressing security concerns, and UNCLOS is not comprehensive enough.

The Guardian - Opinion

These terms are not comprehensive enough to deal with the realm involved: it makes it all seem like a klatch of bourgeois plagiarisms.

The New Yorker

The Government already has a Resolution and Collection Bank, which can absorb failed institutions, but its activities are not comprehensive enough to deal fully with bankrupt banks.

The New York Times

There is concern about pollution in the developing world, where data was not comprehensive enough to carry out studies, Mills said.

The Guardian

They say the proposed cuts are not comprehensive enough because they do not address pensions for teachers, university employees or judges.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

My strategy wasn't comprehensive enough to account for different cases, but it really should be.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The Chamber wants to delay any sort of rulemaking, arguing that this massive, painstakingly-researched empirical study wasn't comprehensive enough.

HuffPost

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "not comprehensive enough", ensure the context clearly indicates what aspects are lacking. Be specific about the areas needing further attention or detail.

Common error

Avoid using "not comprehensive enough" without specifying what needs to be more comprehensive. For example, instead of saying 'The study is not comprehensive enough', specify 'The study is not comprehensive enough regarding the long-term effects'.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not comprehensive enough" typically functions as an adjectival phrase modifying a noun or noun phrase, indicating a deficiency in its completeness or thoroughness. Ludwig AI provides numerous examples demonstrating its use in assessing the scope or detail of various subjects.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

46%

News & Media

43%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Academia

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "not comprehensive enough" is a commonly used expression to indicate a lack of thoroughness or completeness in something, be it a study, a plan, or an analysis. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically sound and appropriate for various contexts, particularly in scientific, news, and business settings. While alternatives like "not thorough enough" or "insufficiently detailed" exist, "not comprehensive enough" effectively conveys the message that more depth or breadth is required. When using this phrase, it is best practice to specify what aspects are lacking to avoid vagueness and enhance clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not thorough enough

Focuses on the lack of thoroughness in the approach or execution.

not exhaustive enough

Emphasizes that all possible options or aspects were not considered.

not complete enough

Highlights the absence of essential elements required for wholeness.

not inclusive enough

Stresses the exclusion of certain relevant factors or elements.

not extensive enough

Indicates a limited scope or coverage in the effort or analysis.

insufficiently detailed

Highlights a lack of specific information or granularity.

lacking in depth

Focuses on the superficiality or lack of deep investigation.

not adequately detailed

Emphasizes that the level of detail is below what is required or expected.

superficial in scope

Highlights the lack of thorough investigation and coverage in the approach.

too limited in scope

Indicates the range or extent is restricted to the point of inadequacy.

FAQs

What does "not comprehensive enough" mean?

The phrase "not comprehensive enough" indicates that something lacks sufficient detail, scope, or thoroughness to be considered complete or adequate for a specific purpose.

How can I use "not comprehensive enough" in a sentence?

You can use "not comprehensive enough" to critique or evaluate the scope of a plan, study, or analysis. For example, 'The initial assessment was informative, but "not comprehensive enough" to address all underlying issues'.

What are some alternatives to "not comprehensive enough"?

Alternatives include "not thorough enough", "not exhaustive enough", or "insufficiently detailed". The best choice depends on the specific context.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "not comprehensive enough"?

It is appropriate when you want to express that something, such as a report, study, or plan, does not cover all the necessary aspects or details, rendering it inadequate for its intended purpose.