not analysed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "not analysed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has not been examined or evaluated. Example: "The data from the last experiment remains not analysed, which is crucial for our final report."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Cases with a contaminated blank block were not analysed (n = 11).

Nature

Not analysed 2.

Heritage Science

Data were not analysed during these phases.

Urban Rail Transit

In [15], this error is not analysed in depth.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

These patient sub-groups were not analysed separately.

Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

However, we have not analysed the expression of other HSPs.

Plosone

NA not analysed.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

+, analysed; na, not analysed.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

NA means not analysed.

BMC Genomics

N/A not analysed.

BMC Plant Biology

Catecholamine's metabolites were not analysed.

BioMed Research International

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "not analysed" in scientific writing, be specific about why the analysis was not conducted. Was it due to sample contamination, data limitations, or scope restrictions? Clarity enhances the credibility of your research.

Common error

Avoid consistently using the passive voice with "not analysed". While grammatically correct, excessive passive voice can make your writing sound vague. Consider rephrasing to use active voice where possible to specify who or what did not perform the analysis.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not analysed" primarily functions as a descriptive element within sentences, indicating that a particular subject (data, sample, result etc.) has not undergone analysis. As Ludwig AI suggests, this phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "not analysed" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed term, particularly in scientific and academic contexts. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it effectively communicates that something has not undergone examination or evaluation. While it is commonly used, remember to be specific about why something was not analysed and avoid overuse of the passive voice. Alternatives such as "not examined" or "not evaluated" can provide stylistic variation. The phrase's high frequency suggests it is a standard and accepted way to convey this meaning in formal writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not examined

Replaces "analysed" with a direct synonym, maintaining the meaning of lack of examination.

not evaluated

Focuses on the lack of assessment or judgement, similar to "not analysed".

not investigated

Emphasizes the absence of a thorough inquiry or study.

not studied

Highlights the absence of a formal or systematic learning process.

left unexamined

Uses a passive voice to convey the state of being without examination.

remained unanalyzed

Emphasizes the continuation of a state where analysis has not occurred.

not assessed

Similar to "not evaluated", stressing the lack of formal assessment.

not explored

Indicates the absence of a detailed investigation or discovery process.

data not processed

Focuses specifically on data that has not undergone processing, similar to analysis in some contexts.

no analysis performed

States directly that the action of analysis did not take place.

FAQs

How can I use "not analysed" in a sentence?

You can use "not analysed" to indicate that something has not been examined or evaluated. For example, "The samples with a contaminated blank block were "not analysed"".

What are some alternatives to "not analysed"?

Some alternatives to "not analysed" include "not examined", "not evaluated", or "not investigated" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "was not analysed" or "were not analysed"?

The correct form depends on the subject. Use "was not analysed" for singular subjects (e.g., "The sample was not analysed"). Use "were not analysed" for plural subjects (e.g., "The samples were not analysed").

What is the difference between "not analysed" and "unanalysed"?

"Not analysed" is a phrase indicating a lack of analysis, while "unanalysed" is an adjective describing something that has not been analysed. Both are acceptable, but the choice depends on the sentence structure. For example: "The data is "unanalysed"" versus "The data was "not analysed"".