normalized with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "normalized with" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
This phrase is used to describe the process of making something conform to an agreed standard. For example: "The data has been normalized with a standard set of protocols for accurate comparison to other data sets."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Science & Research

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Each yield is normalized with respect to the peak value of the corresponding H+ yield.

Nature

Quantification of bands were performed by using ImageJ and normalized with histone H3 levels.

Nature

Quantification of bands were performed by using ImageJ and normalized with β−tubulin levels.

Nature

Each transcript level determined by RT-qPCR analysis was normalized with TUA19.

Nature

OCR was estimated by collinear approximation, and normalized with that of parental cells.

Nature

Firefly luciferase activity was normalized with renilla luciferase activity.

Protein & Cell

The results were normalized with OD600.

Plosone

Normalized with ama-1.

eLife

The results were normalized with GAPDH.

Disease Markers

Then, water loss progressively normalized with time.

Archives of Dermatological Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Microarray data were lowess-normalized with the MIDAS package [46].

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "normalized with", ensure the reference point is clearly defined. State explicitly what the data is being normalized to (e.g., "normalized with GAPDH expression").

Common error

A common mistake is failing to accurately identify or justify the normalization factor. Always select a factor that is stable and relevant to the experimental conditions to ensure meaningful comparisons.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "normalized with" functions as a modifier, specifically an adjectival phrase combined with a preposition. It describes a state where a value has been adjusted in relation to another, making it suitable for comparison. Ludwig AI indicates its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

50%

Science & Research

40%

Academia

10%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "normalized with" serves as a crucial indicator of standardized data, primarily within scientific and academic writing. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and signals that data has undergone adjustment to ensure fair comparison. Its high frequency in scientific publications underscores its importance in technical communication. When employing "normalized with", clarity in specifying the reference point and justifying its stability relative to experimental conditions is paramount.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

standardized against

Focuses on the act of conforming to a standard specifically.

adjusted for

Highlights the aspect of modifying data to account for a variable.

calibrated against

Emphasizes the alignment with a known reference point for accuracy.

expressed relative to

Shifts the focus to the presentation of data in proportion to something else.

referenced to

Highlights the use of a point of reference.

scaled by

Emphasizes a proportional adjustment.

benchmarked against

Implies a comparison to a standard or best practice.

proportional to

Focuses on the direct relationship in magnitude.

compared with

Highlights the act of assessing similarities or differences.

related to

Indicates an association or connection, but is more general.

FAQs

How do I use "normalized with" in a sentence?

Use "normalized with" to indicate that data has been adjusted relative to a reference value. For example, "The gene expression levels were "normalized with" actin expression as an internal control."

What is an alternative to saying "normalized with"?

You can use alternatives like "standardized against", "adjusted for", or "calibrated against" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "normalized with" or "normalized to"?

Both "normalized with" and "normalized to" are acceptable, though "normalized with" is more common in scientific literature when specifying the reference value directly. Consider "normalized to" if you are making a comparison or scaling the data.

What does it mean when data is "normalized with" a specific value?

When data is ""normalized with"" a specific value, it means the original data has been adjusted so that it can be compared fairly across different conditions or samples, accounting for variations in experimental conditions, sample size, or other confounding factors.