none has received

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "none has received" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that no individuals or entities have received something, typically in a formal or academic context. Example: "Despite the numerous invitations sent out, none has received a response from the participants."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

12 human-written examples

None has received one.

The New York Times

None has received justice, all have been tortured.

The Guardian

While many are teenagers, none has received anything like the attention given to the McCanns.

The Guardian - Opinion

"None has received so many emotional opinions — so much love, and so much hate".

The New Yorker

Of all the financial institutions that have been propped up by taxpayer dollars, none has received more money than A.I.G. and none has infuriated lawmakers more with practices that policy makers have called reckless.

The New York Times

Human Rights Watch and others have sent rafts of letters to the government, but none has received a reply.Many other critics suspect that the AL's seemingly vindictive treatment of Nobel prize-winning economist, Muhammad Yunus, may also have pushed America towards withdrawing the GSP.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

48 human-written examples

None had received a penny.

The New York Times

But none had received death sentence in recent years.

The New York Times

None had received vitamin K supplementation for at least 4 months before the study.

The Journal of Pediatrics

But none have received anywhere near the attention of this case.

The Washington Post

None had received an apology, compensation or an offer to repair the door.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "none has received", ensure the context clearly specifies what was not received and who was meant to receive it. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using plural verbs with "none has received". Remember that "none" functions as a singular pronoun in this context, requiring a singular verb form.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "none has received" functions as a declarative statement expressing a lack of reception. As evidenced by Ludwig, this phrase is typically used to convey that no individual or entity has obtained something, whether it be an item, information, or a particular outcome.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

45%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "none has received" is grammatically correct and functions as a declarative statement indicating a lack of reception. According to Ludwig, it's used in neutral to formal contexts like news, media, and scientific publications, to inform and emphasize that something has not been obtained by anyone. While other alternatives exist, such as "no one has obtained" or "nobody has gotten", it's crucial to maintain subject-verb agreement and clarity in usage. Although "none" can sometimes be plural, in this context it is more commonly used as singular. Overall, "none has received" is a reliable phrase suitable for a variety of writing scenarios.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no one has obtained

Replaces 'received' with 'obtained', emphasizing the act of getting or acquiring something, and replaces 'none' with 'no one' making it more personalized.

nobody has gotten

Uses 'gotten' as a more informal synonym for 'received', and replaces 'none' with 'nobody', making the expression more colloquial.

not a single person has been given

Emphasizes the lack of anyone receiving something by using 'not a single person', which heightens the sense of absence.

no individual has been granted

Replaces 'none' with 'no individual' for a more formal tone and uses 'granted' to specifically imply permission or authorization.

zero have acquired

Uses 'zero' to quantify the absence of reception and replaces 'received' with 'acquired', suggesting ownership or lasting possession.

nothing was awarded to anyone

Shifts the focus to the 'nothing' being awarded, emphasizing the total lack of distribution.

no benefits were conferred

Implies a formal context, focusing on the act of bestowing a benefit, right or privilege.

all were denied

Highlights a rejection or refusal, making the lack of reception more active and deliberate.

the applications were rejected

Shifts the focus to the rejection of applications, specifying the type of reception that did not occur.

everyone was overlooked

Suggests that people were ignored or missed, which led to them not receiving something they might have deserved.

FAQs

How can I use "none has received" in a sentence?

You can use "none has received" to indicate that no one has obtained something. For example, "Despite the invitations, "none has received" a response."

What's a more formal alternative to "none has received"?

A more formal alternative to "none has received" could be "no individual has been granted", especially in official or academic contexts.

Is it grammatically correct to say "none have received"?

While "none" can sometimes be plural, in the context of ""none has received"", it's generally treated as singular, making "none has received" the grammatically preferred form.

Which is correct, "none has received" or "no one has received"?

Both ""none has received"" and "no one has received" are grammatically correct and interchangeable, but "no one has received" may sound less formal.