none has been

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "none has been" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that none of something has been done or none of something is present. For example: "None has been able to solve the mystery of the missing cat."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

None has been strong.

The Economist

None has been cogent.

Independent

None has been forthcoming.

The Economist

None has been met.

The Economist

None has been successful.

The Washington Post

None has been charged with espionage.

The New York Times

None has been granted yet.

The New York Times

None has been charged so far.

The Washington Post

Until now, none has been made".

The Guardian - Sport

None has been spent on roofs.

The New Yorker

None has been adopted as yet.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "none has been" to clearly indicate that a particular action or state has not occurred or that no instances of something exist. Ensure the context clearly specifies what "none" refers to for clarity.

Common error

Avoid treating "none" as inherently plural. While "none" can refer to multiple items, it often takes a singular verb when the context implies a lack of individual instances. Using "none have been" might sound awkward; "none has been" is generally preferred for clarity and correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "none has been" functions as a negative assertion, indicating the absence of something or the non-occurrence of an event. Ludwig confirms its proper usage in denying existence or action.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Academia

27%

Science

27%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "none has been" is a grammatically correct and versatile phrase used to express the absence of something or the non-occurrence of an event. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase follows standard grammar rules and is widely accepted. The phrase is "none has been" common in News & Media, Academia, and Scientific contexts. When using "none has been", ensure clarity by specifying what "none" refers to and avoid treating it as inherently plural. Alternatives like "nothing has been" or "no one has been" can be used for variety, depending on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

nothing has been

Uses "nothing" instead of "none" to emphasize the complete absence of something.

not one has been

Emphasizes the individual absence from a group or category.

no one has been

Replaces "none" with "no one" to focus on the absence of a person.

nobody has been

Similar to "no one has been", highlighting the absence of any person.

zero have been

Uses "zero" to quantify the absence, often used with countable nouns.

not any has been

A slightly less common way to express the same absence or lack.

in no instance has there been

Formal and emphatic way to state that something has never occurred.

there has been nothing

Reverses the structure, focusing on the absence of something rather than the subject.

no instance has been

Highlights the absence of a specific occurrence or example.

absolutely none has been

Adds emphasis to the complete absence of something using "absolutely".

FAQs

How can I use "none has been" in a sentence?

Use "none has been" to indicate that something hasn't happened or that no instance of something exists. For example, "Despite multiple attempts, "none has been" successful."

What are some alternatives to "none has been"?

You can use alternatives such as "nothing has been", "no one has been", or "not one has been" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "none have been" instead of "none has been"?

While "none" can sometimes be treated as plural, ""none has been"" is generally preferred in formal writing when referring to a singular absence. "None have been" is acceptable when clearly referring to a plural group, but can sound awkward.

What's the difference between "nothing has been" and ""none has been""?

"Nothing" refers to the complete absence of something, while "none" implies that out of a group or set, not one meets a certain condition or has been affected. "Nothing has been decided" means no decision has been made, whereas "none has been selected" implies that no one from a list has been chosen.