no supporting evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no supporting evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a claim, argument, or assertion that lacks any proof or substantiation. Example: "The committee decided to dismiss the proposal due to no supporting evidence provided by the applicant."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Theory B has no supporting evidence, nor is any attempt made to find any.

The New York Times - Books

She introduced no supporting evidence to that effect.

The New Yorker

White examined this argument and found no supporting evidence.

The Guardian

It was a definitive statement, no supporting evidence needed.

The Guardian

He made the claim more than once, but gave no supporting evidence.

The New York Times

And there is no supporting evidence to back that up from her point".

The Guardian - Sport

While Mr. Craft states unequivocally that Ravel and Stravinsky were "time-to-time lovers," he offers no supporting evidence whatsoever.

The New York Times - Arts

I only signed a letter, for that I get hammered in the [Macpherson] inquiry, with no supporting evidence at all, not one shred.

The Guardian

He said that "she has implied, with no supporting evidence, that he is a suspect in his wife's disappearance and Susan Berman".

The New York Times

Instead, she said, doctors too often promoted trial treatments as superior to standard approaches, even when there was no supporting evidence.

The New York Times

Amusing, too, how it's automatically accepted that the older version of oneself is so much wiser and nicer, often with no supporting evidence whatsoever.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "no supporting evidence" to clearly and directly indicate the absence of proof for a claim or argument. This ensures clarity and avoids ambiguity in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "no supporting evidence" as a rhetorical flourish to dismiss opposing viewpoints without thoroughly investigating the evidence. Always ensure that your assessment is based on a comprehensive evaluation rather than a biased perspective.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no supporting evidence" functions as a determiner phrase followed by a noun, typically used to negate the existence of proof or substantiation for a claim. Ludwig examples confirm that it's used to point out a lack of factual basis for an argument or assertion.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

41%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Opinion

3%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "no supporting evidence" is a common and grammatically correct way to indicate the absence of proof for a claim. Ludwig AI confirms its widespread use across various contexts, including news, science, and general discourse. While several alternatives exist, such as "lacks substantiation" or "without any proof", "no supporting evidence" is a direct and effective way to highlight the lack of factual basis. Its frequency and use in authoritative sources underscore its acceptability in formal and professional writing. It is crucial to use this phrase judiciously, ensuring that any assessment of lacking evidence is based on thorough analysis and not biased opinion.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

without any proof

Directly states the absence of evidence.

no proof available

States the unavailability of any verification.

evidence is lacking

Emphasizes the deficiency in evidence.

lacks substantiation

Focuses on the absence of proof or validation.

unsubstantiated claim

Highlights the claim's lack of backing.

devoid of evidence

Stresses a complete absence of evidence.

unsupported by facts

Focuses on the lack of factual basis.

without validation

Highlights the lack of confirmation or accuracy.

not backed by data

Highlights the absence of empirical support.

unconfirmed reports

Indicates that the information lacks confirmation.

FAQs

How can I use "no supporting evidence" in a sentence?

You can use "no supporting evidence" to indicate the lack of proof for a statement. For example, "The hypothesis was rejected because there was "no supporting evidence" to validate it."

What are some alternatives to saying "no supporting evidence"?

Alternatives include "lacks substantiation", "without any proof", or "evidence is lacking".

Is it correct to say "there is no supportive evidence" instead of "no supporting evidence"?

While "supportive evidence" isn't incorrect, "supporting evidence" is the more common and idiomatic phrasing. "There is "no supporting evidence"" is generally preferred in formal writing.

What does it mean when a claim has "no supporting evidence"?

It means that there is no verifiable data, facts, or proof to back up the claim. It implies that the claim is based on speculation, conjecture, or opinion rather than concrete evidence.