no significant effect

USAGE SUMMARY

'no significant effect' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to describe a situation when something has been done but had no significant effect on the outcome. For example, "We implemented a new training program, but it had no significant effect on employee performance."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But helmets had no significant effect.

The New York Times

Again, there was no significant effect.

The Guardian

However, 51% said it was having no significant effect.

The Guardian - Business

Exogenous IL-7 exhibited no significant effect.

Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Post length had no significant effect.

Acta Biomaterialia

Payment volatility had no significant effect.

Ecological Economics

The mutual interactions have no significant effect.

Biochemical Engineering Journal

Progesterone treatment had no significant effect.

Theriogenology

However, they have no significant effect on decreasing rat populations.

Columbia University

Doubling CO2 had no significant effect on Plantago.

Stanford University

NS, no significant effect comparing VEH-CLOZ with THC-CLOZ.

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "no significant effect" in scientific writing, ensure your statistical analysis supports this claim. Always include p-values or confidence intervals to demonstrate the lack of statistical significance.

Common error

Avoid concluding that there is absolutely no effect when you find "no significant effect". It only indicates that there wasn't enough evidence to prove an effect, but a small effect might still exist.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no significant effect" functions as a descriptive statement indicating the absence of a statistically meaningful impact or influence. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage and the examples showcase its role in various academic and professional contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

65%

News & Media

20%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "no significant effect" is a common phrase used to express the absence of a statistically meaningful impact. Ludwig AI data confirms the phrase is grammatically correct and widely used, especially in scientific and academic writing. While other phrases like "no appreciable impact" or "no notable consequence" can be used as alternatives, it's crucial to understand the statistical implications and avoid overstating the absence of any effect whatsoever. Remember to always consider the confidence intervals and p-values when interpreting results reported as having "no significant effect".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no appreciable impact

Emphasizes the lack of noticeable or measurable influence.

no notable consequence

Highlights the absence of important or remarkable results.

no substantial alteration

Focuses on the lack of major changes or modifications.

no marked difference

Indicates the absence of a distinct or easily observed variation.

no meaningful change

Stresses the absence of changes with practical or relevant importance.

no discernible influence

Highlights the lack of perceivable impact or effect.

no tangible outcome

Focuses on the absence of concrete or measurable results.

did not make a difference

A more conversational way of saying there was no impact.

no evident effect

Emphasizes the lack of easily visible impact.

no real impact

A simpler way of indicating that something didn't have a significant effect.

FAQs

How to use "no significant effect" in a sentence?

You can use "no significant effect" to describe a situation where a particular intervention or variable did not produce a statistically significant change. For example, "The new drug had "no significant effect" on the patients' recovery time."

What can I say instead of "no significant effect"?

You can use alternatives like "no appreciable impact", "no notable consequence", or "did not make a difference" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "no significant effect" or "no significant impact"?

Both "no significant effect" and "no significant impact" are correct and often interchangeable. The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey; "effect" is more general, while "impact" suggests a more forceful influence.

What does it mean when a study reports "no significant effect"?

It means that the study did not find enough statistical evidence to support the claim that the tested variable had a real impact on the outcome. It does not necessarily mean there was absolutely no effect, just that it wasn't statistically demonstrable.