no members

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no members" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the absence of individuals in a group or organization. Example: "The committee has been disbanded, and as a result, there are no members left to make decisions."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

No Members of Parliament were allowed to sit.

Wikipedia

"No members of the clergy".

The New Yorker

No members have been arrested.

The New York Times

No members of the media were present.

The New York Times

There are no members with our gardens.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

No members of the shadow cabinet voted against the bill.

Independent

No members of news media will be allowed.

The New York Times - Sports

At first we had no members and no money.

The Guardian - Opinion

Its funders are anonymous – and it has no members.

The Guardian

But no members have been named yet, aides said.

The New York Times

No members of the opposition currently serve in Parliament.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "no members", ensure the context clearly defines the group or organization being referenced. This avoids ambiguity and strengthens the statement's clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "no member" when referring to multiple individuals. The correct form is "no members" to indicate the absence of multiple members in a group.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no members" functions primarily as a determiner phrase that modifies a noun, indicating the absence of individuals belonging to a specific group, team, or organization. As stated by Ludwig, the phrase is usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

25%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "no members" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to denote the absence of individuals in a group or organization. Ludwig AI confirms its usability. Its usage spans across diverse contexts, including news, science, and general discussions. While primarily neutral in register, it's essential to ensure clarity by defining the group in question. Alternatives like "without any members" or "lacking members" can provide slight variations in emphasis, depending on the intended message.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no one is a member

Directly states that there are no individuals who are part of the group.

lacking members

Highlights the deficiency of members.

without any members

Focuses on the lack of members using a prepositional phrase.

there aren't any participants

Replaces "members" with "participants", broadening the scope slightly.

devoid of members

Emphasizes the absence of members, using a more formal tone.

without a single member

Stresses the complete absence of even one member.

membership is empty

Treats membership as a container that is currently empty.

nobody belongs

Shifts the focus to the act of belonging, rather than the members themselves.

the roster is vacant

Uses the term 'roster' to imply a list of members that has no names on it.

the team is incomplete

Emphasizes lack of the number of the members to form the team/group.

FAQs

How can I use "no members" in a sentence?

You can use "no members" to indicate the absence of individuals in a group or organization. For example, "The club currently has "no members" due to recent restructuring".

What are some alternatives to "no members"?

Alternatives include "without any members", "lacking members", or "nobody belongs", depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "no member" instead of "no members"?

No, "no member" is not grammatically correct when referring to a group. You should use "no members" to indicate that there are no individuals in a group.

What's the difference between "no members" and "without members"?

"No members" is a direct statement indicating the absence of members. "Without members" is a prepositional phrase that also indicates the absence of members but can be used in a broader context, such as describing a state or condition.