no longer part

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'no longer part' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something in the past, to emphasize that it is no longer applicable in the present. For example: "I am no longer part of the team; I decided to pursue other interests."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That product is no longer part of "earth's biggest selection".

The New York Times

I am no longer part of all that.

The Guardian

Student Health Insurance is no longer part of the required fees for the EWMBA Program.

University of California, Berkeley

To the pained listeners, it seemed that they were no longer part of this language group.

The New Yorker

But both said that they were no longer part of the inquiry.

The New York Times - Tech

"I'm no longer part of the system, but I keep having them.

The New York Times

Their people are no longer part of the organization they joined.

Harvard Business Review

It is impossible to know for sure why he is no longer part of the bid.

The Guardian - Sport

He is no longer part of the collective leadership of a guerrilla force, he has captured the commanding heights.

The Guardian - Opinion

Döring argued that: It could help to create confidence in markets if Greece were no longer part of the Eurozone.

The Guardian - Business

Yet, its employees are no longer part of the civil service.

Health Economics Review

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "no longer part", ensure the context clearly indicates what the subject was previously a part of. Clarity prevents ambiguity and strengthens the message.

Common error

Avoid using "no longer part" when the subject was never actually a part of something. Use alternative phrasing like "was never part of" to maintain accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no longer part" functions as a predicate adjective, describing the state of a subject that has ceased to be a member or component of something. As confirmed by Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Academia

21%

Science

11%

Less common in

Wiki

7%

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "no longer part" is a grammatically correct and very common expression used to indicate that something or someone has ceased to be a member or component of a group, organization, or system. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is widely used across various contexts, including news, academia, and science. While alternatives like "not involved anymore" or "disassociated from" exist, "no longer part" provides a clear and direct way to communicate a change in status or affiliation. When using this phrase, ensure the context clearly defines what the subject was previously a part of to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not involved anymore

Focuses on the cessation of involvement, shifting the emphasis from belonging to activity.

no longer affiliated with

Implies a formal or official severing of ties.

separated from

Implies a division or removal from a previously connected entity.

not included in

Highlights the absence of inclusion rather than a previous connection.

not a member of

Specifically refers to a lack of membership in a group or organization.

disassociated from

Emphasizes a formal or deliberate separation from a group or entity.

excluded from

Highlights the act of being kept out of something.

outside of

Indicates a physical or metaphorical boundary that excludes something.

independent of

Indicates a state of autonomy and lack of connection or reliance.

detached from

Suggests a more emotional or philosophical separation.

FAQs

How can I use "no longer part" in a sentence?

You can use "no longer part" to indicate that someone or something was once included in a group, organization, or system but is now excluded. For example, "He is "no longer part" of the team".

What are some alternatives to saying "no longer part"?

Alternatives include "not involved anymore", "disassociated from", or "detached from", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "not part anymore" instead of "no longer part"?

While "not part anymore" is understandable, ""no longer part"" is generally considered more formal and grammatically correct.

How does "no longer part" differ from "not part of"?

"No longer part" implies a previous inclusion that has ceased, while "not part of" simply indicates a current state of exclusion without necessarily implying a past connection.