no longer has

USAGE SUMMARY

"no longer has" is correct and usable in written English.
You could use it to indicate that something has stopped or been lost. Example: After years of financial trouble, the company no longer has the resources to stay in business.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

He no longer has one.

The New York Times - Sports

Sergeant Gogarty no longer has to recruit.

The New York Times

But she no longer has that option.

The New York Times

"The bookstore no longer has that draw".

The New York Times

He no longer has to wonder.

The New York Times - Sports

It no longer has that option.

The Economist

China no longer has boundless cheap labour.

The Economist

He no longer has that luxury.

The Economist

Torre no longer has the same luxury.

The New York Times - Sports

But Wimbledon no longer has such issues.

The New York Times - Sports

It no longer has any.

The Guardian - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Be mindful of the tense. The phrase refers to a current state resulting from a past change.

Common error

Avoid using "no longer has" when describing a future state. This phrase is best suited for describing current conditions that have changed from the past.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no longer has" functions as a verbal phrase indicating the cessation of possession or availability. As supported by Ludwig's examples, it describes a state that has changed over time.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

62%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "no longer has" is a versatile phrase used to express that something or someone previously possessed something but does not anymore. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread use, particularly in news, media, science, and formal business contexts. When using "no longer has", ensure the correct tense and consider alternatives like "does not have anymore" or "is without" to fine-tune your expression. Avoid using the phrase to describe future states, and consider that it's more formal than saying something "doesn't have anymore".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

does not have anymore

Rephrases the idea using "anymore" to emphasize the change in possession.

has lost

Focuses on the act of losing possession.

is now lacking

Emphasizes the current absence of something that was previously present.

is no longer in possession of

A formal and emphatic way of stating the lack of ownership.

is without

Indicates a lack of something at the present time.

does not possess

A more formal way of saying something is not owned or held.

used to have but doesn't now

Explicitly states the previous possession and subsequent loss.

is without access to

Specifically denotes the inability to use or obtain something.

is deprived of

Highlights the act of being dispossessed or denied something.

cannot claim anymore

Indicates that something can't be requested or obtained anymore.

FAQs

How can I use "no longer has" in a sentence?

Use "no longer has" to indicate that something or someone used to possess something but does not anymore. For example: "The company "no longer has" the resources to continue the project".

What are some alternatives to "no longer has"?

Alternatives include "does not have anymore", "is without", or "has lost", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "doesn't have anymore" instead of "no longer has"?

While "doesn't have anymore" is commonly used and understandable, "no longer has" is often considered more formal and grammatically precise.

What is the difference between "no longer has" and "never had"?

"No longer has" indicates a change of state, meaning something was possessed at one point but isn't anymore. "Never had" indicates that something was never possessed at any point in time.