no longer contributed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no longer contributed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone or something has stopped providing input, support, or resources over a period of time. Example: "After the merger, the company no longer contributed to the community fund, which disappointed many local organizations."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

As a result, the longitudinal displacements from the free and elastic deformation no longer contributed to the steering.

Journal of Modern Transportation

However, for two-character words, although there is a negative correlation between RTs and the frequencies of the first characters, we saw that character frequencies no longer contributed to the variance in RTs once the word frequencies were taken into account in the multiple regression analyses.

Plosone

Family factors no longer contributed significantly to the prediction model.

European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Recruitment was stopped once data phrases no longer contributed novel themes or ideas to the analytical categories.

BMC Health Services Research

Once current depressive symptoms were added, length of DUP no longer contributed significantly to the model (Model 2, Table  3).

BMC Psychiatry

Deleted neurons no longer contributed to running-time histograms of network activity and were removed from raster plots (e.g., Figure 6C).

eLife

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

49 human-written examples

A Washington Post investigation also found that Trump no longer contributes to the personal foundation that bears his name, and used donors' contributions to the charity to settle legal disputes involving his businesses.

Los Angeles Times

She will no longer contribute to Crain's New York Business.

The New York Times

The federal government will no longer contribute its 50percentt share, as it does now.

The New York Times

The UK has confirmed in writing that it is no longer contributing.

The Guardian

Also, after some burnup, the old fuel no longer contributes useful reactivity to the reactor.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "no longer contributed" to clearly indicate that a person or entity previously provided something (effort, resources, input) but has stopped doing so. This phrasing is suitable for formal and professional contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "no longer contributed" when you mean to say something or someone never contributed. "Never contributed" implies a complete absence of contribution, whereas "no longer contributed" implies a past contribution that has since ceased.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no longer contributed" functions as a past participle phrase, often modifying a noun or pronoun to indicate that a previous action or input has ceased. As stated by Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

42%

News & Media

42%

Encyclopedias

8%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "no longer contributed" is a grammatically correct way to express that something or someone has stopped providing input or support. Ludwig AI confirms the correctness of the phrase. It is found in various contexts, from scientific articles to news reports, with a neutral tone suitable for formal communication. When writing, ensure that the phrase accurately conveys a cessation of contribution, not a lack of initial contribution. Alternatives like "stopped contributing" or "ceased to contribute" can be used depending on the desired formality.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

stopped contributing

Replaces "no longer" with "stopped", a direct synonym, maintaining the same tense and meaning.

ceased to contribute

Substitutes "no longer" with "ceased", a more formal synonym, conveying a similar sense of discontinuation.

did not contribute anymore

Rephrases the sentence structure to emphasize the absence of further contribution.

no longer provided input

Replaces "contributed" with "provided input", focusing on the act of supplying information or resources.

was not contributing anymore

Changes the verb tense to continuous past to highlight the state of not contributing at a point in time.

no longer supported

Substitutes "contributed" with "supported", emphasizing the cessation of assistance or endorsement.

halted contributions

Uses a noun phrase to describe the action, making the phrase more concise.

discontinued contributions

Employs a more formal term, "discontinued", to indicate the termination of contributions.

withdrew support

Focuses on the removal of backing or aid, implying a deliberate action.

abandoned contributions

Suggests a more complete and possibly abrupt ending to the act of contributing.

FAQs

How can I use "no longer contributed" in a sentence?

You can use "no longer contributed" to indicate that someone or something previously provided support or input but has stopped doing so. For example, "After the policy change, the department "no longer contributed" to the project's funding".

What can I say instead of "no longer contributed"?

Alternatives include "stopped contributing", "ceased to contribute", or "did not contribute anymore", depending on the specific context and desired level of formality.

Is "no longer contributed" grammatically correct?

Yes, "no longer contributed" is grammatically correct. The phrase indicates a past action that has stopped. As Ludwig AI explains, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

What's the difference between "no longer contributes" and "no longer contributed"?

"No longer contributes" refers to a present or habitual action that has stopped. "No longer contributed" refers to a past action that has stopped. For example, "The company "no longer contributes" to the charity" (present), versus "The company "no longer contributed" after 2022" (past).