no liability

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no liability" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it in legal documents, contracts, or disclaimers to indicate that a party is not responsible for certain outcomes or damages. Example: "The company accepts no liability for any losses incurred during the event." Alternative expressions include "no responsibility" and "no accountability."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

See no evil, face no liability.

The New York Times

The bank has said it has no liability.

The New York Times

News Group accepted no liability for the alleged 2009 incident.

The Guardian

The city admitted no liability in the settlement.

The New York Times

I.B.M. itself has no liability for the center.

The New York Times

MCI says that when it bought the firm, it was told it had no liability.

The Economist

"Since he is not resident in this country, no liability for tax arises under this structure".

The Guardian - Money

His previous employer would have faced no liability in disclosing the accusation.

The New York Times

A dozen or more nursing homes in Florida now operate with no liability insurance at all.

The New York Times

No liability for CGT arose on the sale of her flat in Kennington".

The Guardian

Lawyers for Bear Stearns argued that the firm had no liability for Mr. de Kwiatkowski's losses.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In formal settlements, use the phrase to clarify that a payment is being made without an admission of wrongdoing.

Common error

Avoid using "no liability" in casual interpersonal contexts where "no fault" or "no blame" would be more natural. Liability carries a specific weight of legal or financial restitution that is often out of place in informal conversation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no liability" functions as a noun phrase used to denote the complete absence of legal or financial obligation. In the examples provided by Ludwig, it often acts as the direct object of verbs like "admit", "accept", "bear", or "face". Ludwig AI identifies it as a grammatically correct structure following the standard negation of a noun.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Formal & Business

25%

Science

10%

Less common in

Wiki

6%

Reference

3%

Social Media

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In conclusion, "no liability" is a robust and essential phrase within the English language, particularly in professional sectors. Data from Ludwig confirms its status as a very common expression used to deny legal or financial responsibility, especially during legal settlements or in disclaimers. Ludwig AI notes that the phrase is grammatically standard and highly effective at providing a clear, unambiguous boundary of obligation. Whether found in a high-stakes report in The New York Times or a technical paper in ScienceDirect, the phrase serves as a critical tool for risk management and objective reporting. Writers should favor it in formal contexts to maintain a precise and professional tone, while perhaps opting for "no blame" in more casual settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no responsibility

A broader, more general term that encompasses moral and social duties beyond legal ones

no legal obligation

More explicit about the statutory nature of the requirement

no accountability

Emphasizes the lack of answerability for actions or outcomes

not liable

The adjectival form of the phrase, used as a predicate

zero liability

Frequently used in consumer finance to emphasize absolute protection

no culpability

Focuses specifically on the absence of blame or fault

exemption from liability

Suggests a specific release from a rule that would otherwise apply

no indemnity

Specifically refers to the lack of security against loss or compensation

disclaimer of liability

Refers to the formal statement or document that denies responsibility

limited liability

Suggests a restriction rather than a total absence of responsibility

FAQs

How do I use "no liability" in a sentence?

You can use it to define a boundary of responsibility, such as "The city admitted "no liability" in the settlement" or "The bank has said it has no liability for the losses."

What is the difference between "no liability" and "no responsibility"?

While often used interchangeably, "no liability" is strictly legal and financial, whereas "no responsibility" can also refer to ethical or social duties.

Is "zero liability" better than "no liability"?

Not necessarily. "zero liability" is a common marketing term for credit cards, but "no liability" is more frequently found in news reporting and legal documentation.

When should I use "not liable" instead?

Use "not liable" when you need an adjective to describe a subject, for example, "The defendant was found not liable by the jury."