no less imprudent

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "no less imprudent" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to emphasize that something is equally unwise or reckless as another action or decision. Example: "His decision to invest in that failing company was no less imprudent than his previous financial choices."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

"He deserves no less".

The New York Times - Arts

And in "Gatsby," no less.

The New York Times

By doctors, no less.

Harvard University

A silver medallist no less.

Independent

Our guests deserve no less.

The New York Times

Am I no less a king, no less well off?

Harvard University

No less than that".

Wikipedia

On Wilshire Boulevard, no less.

Los Angeles Times

No less than U.S. Atty.

Los Angeles Times

No less, no more.

The New York Times

No less.

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "no less imprudent" to draw a direct comparison between two actions or decisions, emphasizing that they are equally unwise. It adds a touch of formality and emphasis.

Common error

Avoid using "no less imprudent" in casual conversation or informal writing. Its slightly formal tone can sound out of place in everyday contexts.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no less imprudent" functions as an adjectival modifier, serving to emphasize that something is equally unwise or lacking in judgment compared to something else. Given the absence of specific examples, this determination is based on general linguistic principles.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "no less imprudent" is a grammatically correct and meaningful expression used to emphasize that something is equally unwise or lacking in good judgment as something else. As determined by Ludwig, it serves as an adjectival modifier to draw comparisons and highlight shared characteristics of poor decision-making. While its slightly formal tone makes it better suited for formal writing, it should be used cautiously in informal conversation. While there are no specific examples available, the phrase can effectively underscore the equal lack of wisdom between two actions or situations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

equally unwise

This alternative directly replaces "no less imprudent" with a more straightforward expression of equal lack of wisdom.

just as reckless

This alternative uses "reckless" to convey a similar sense of imprudence, emphasizing the lack of caution.

similarly ill-advised

This alternative uses "ill-advised" to describe an action that lacks good judgment, mirroring the meaning of "imprudent".

no more judicious

This alternative uses the positive form of "judicious" (wise) in a negative construction to create a comparative expression of imprudence.

no wiser

A shorter, more direct way of saying something is equally lacking in wisdom.

just as foolhardy

Replaces "imprudent" with "foolhardy", highlighting the foolishness and risk-taking aspect.

equally irresponsible

This alternative focuses on the lack of responsibility in the action, conveying a similar sense of poor judgment.

no more circumspect

This alternative uses "circumspect" (cautious) in a negative construction to convey a lack of caution.

as unwise

A concise way to say something is similarly lacking in wisdom.

just as rash

This alternative replaces "imprudent" with "rash", focusing on the impulsiveness and lack of forethought.

FAQs

How can I use "no less imprudent" in a sentence?

You can use "no less imprudent" to compare two actions, indicating they are equally unwise. For example, "His decision to ignore the warning signs was "no less imprudent" than his previous financial blunders."

What are some alternatives to "no less imprudent"?

Alternatives include "equally unwise", "just as reckless", or "similarly ill-advised". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "no less imprudent"?

Yes, "no less imprudent" is grammatically correct. It follows the standard structure of using "no less" to modify an adjective, indicating an equivalent degree of the quality.

What is the difference between "imprudent" and "reckless"?

"Imprudent" suggests a lack of wisdom or good judgment, while "reckless" implies a disregard for danger or consequences. While related, "reckless" carries a stronger connotation of risk-taking. You could replace imprudent with "just as reckless".