no involvement

USAGE SUMMARY

"no involvement" is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
You can use it when you want to emphasize that someone or something is not involved in a situation. Example Sentence: The police found no evidence of my involvement in the crime.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Soco has no involvement.

The Guardian

No involvement from Galliano.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

I had no involvement.

The Guardian

The wristband has no involvement.

The New York Times - Tech

"We have no involvement whatsoever".

The New York Times

I am saying I had no involvement".

Independent

He had no involvement with terrorism.

The New York Times

Hollywood unions said they had no involvement.

The New York Times

"The Americans have no involvement in this.

The New York Times

"The coaches had no involvement," Wetherell said.

The New York Times

no involvement do they have and loudly do they cry.

University of California, Berkeley

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "no involvement" to clearly state a lack of participation, responsibility, or connection to an event, decision, or organization. This phrase is useful in formal and informal contexts when clarifying someone's position or stance.

Common error

Avoid simply stating "no involvement" without explaining the situation or reason. Always clarify what the lack of involvement pertains to, ensuring your audience understands the context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "no involvement" primarily functions as a noun phrase, often serving as the object of a verb or preposition to denote the absence of participation or connection. Ludwig provides numerous examples showcasing its role in clarifying a lack of association or responsibility.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "no involvement" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to express a lack of participation or connection. As highlighted by Ludwig, it functions primarily as a noun phrase, often employed to clarify a position or deny responsibility across diverse contexts. It is commonly found in news, scientific, and academic sources, maintaining a neutral tone suitable for both formal and informal communication. When using this phrase, it's crucial to provide context to ensure clarity. Related alternatives include "no participation", "not associated", and "no connection", each offering subtle variations in meaning. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's grammatical correctness and provides ample real-world examples.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no participation

Focuses on the absence of taking part in something.

no connection

Indicates the absence of any kind of relationship or link.

not implicated

Emphasizes the absence of being connected to a negative situation, like a crime or scandal.

not associated

Highlights the lack of a link or connection between entities.

not a party to

A more formal way of saying someone was not involved in an agreement or action.

not concerned

Suggests a lack of interest or relevance to a specific matter.

no hand in

Informal expression indicating no contribution to or responsibility for something.

not mixed up in

Suggests avoiding implication in something shady or problematic.

stand aloof from

Highlights a deliberate choice to remain separate and uninvolved.

not in the loop

Highlights the absence of being informed about something.

FAQs

How can I use "no involvement" in a sentence?

You can use "no involvement" to state a lack of participation or connection. For example, "The company stated it had "no involvement" in the decision-making process".

What are some alternatives to "no involvement"?

Alternatives include phrases like "no participation", "not associated", or "no connection", depending on the specific context.

Is it more appropriate to say "no involvement" or "not involved"?

"No involvement" is a noun phrase that emphasizes the absence of participation. "Not involved" is an adjective phrase describing someone's state. Both are correct, but they have slightly different uses. For instance, "There was "no involvement"" versus "He was "not involved"".

What does it mean when someone claims to have "no involvement"?

When someone claims to have "no involvement", they are asserting that they did not participate in or have any connection to a particular event, decision, or activity.